Upward Influence Tactics in Virtual Work Settings

The globalization of work within organizations has generated a greater need for all type of workers to exert interpersonal influence through technology-mediated communication tools. This paper contributes to the analysis of interpersonal relations in virtual environments from a specific perspective: the choice of upward influence tactics. We propose that virtual work settings may impact the upward influence tactic selected, as well as the communication medium used to enact it. In particular, we study whether the types of upward influence strategies found in presence environments, are relevant in a virtual work context. This research also analyzes the link between communication media and influence tactics used. Preliminary results suggest that there is an influence tactic that is specific of virtual work relations, which may be called intermediation and consists of finding a mediator who is well connected with the target and can help in defining the best approach by the agent.

[1]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Do Leaders' Influence Tactics Relate to Members' Helping Behavior? IT Depends on the Quality of the Relationship , 2006 .

[2]  Efrat Elron,et al.  Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace , 2006 .

[3]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Putting upward influence strategies in context , 1997 .

[4]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[5]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  Choice of influence tactics: Individual and organizational determinants , 1991 .

[6]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  D. Cable,et al.  Employee resistance to organizational change: managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[9]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[10]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  Contextualizing Influence Activities: An Objective Hermeneutical Approach , 2005 .

[11]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[12]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[13]  B. V. Knippenberg,et al.  Future interaction expectation and the use of soft and hard influence tactics , 2003 .

[14]  F. Schmidt.  Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  Perceptions of Influence in Managerial Dyads: The Role of Hierarchy, Media, and Tactics , 1992 .

[16]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[17]  Martin Gargiulo.  Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics , 1993 .

[18]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. , 1990 .

[19]  James H. Dulebohn,et al.  The Role of Influence Tactics in Perceptions of Performance Evaluations’ Fairness , 1999 .

[20]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A study of upward influence in organizations. , 1982 .

[21]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The relationship of subordinate upward influencing behaviour, satisfaction and perceived superior effectiveness with leader—member exchanges , 1991 .

[22]  Why managers prefer some influence tactics to other tactics: A net utility explanation , 2007 .

[23]  G. Yukl,et al.  Consequences of Influence Tactics Used With Subordinates, Peers, and the Boss , 1992 .

[24]  Rebecca A. Thacker,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship Between Upward Influence Tactics and Assessments of Promotability , 1995 .

[25]  J. Barbuto,et al.  Dispositional Effects in Intra-Organizational Influence Tactics: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2006 .

[26]  N. Cho,et al.  Effects of the Upward Influence Strategies on the Communication Media Selection , 2008 .

[27]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[28]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  CONSEQUENCES FOR MANAGERS OF USING SINGLE INFLUENCE TACTICS AND COMBINATIONS OF TACTICS , 1992 .

[29]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[30]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[31]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[32]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[33]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta‐analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Anit Somech,et al.  Relative power and influence strategy: the effects of agent/target organizational power on superiors' choices of influence strategies , 2002 .

[35]  Stuart M. Schmidt,et al.  Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. , 1988 .

[36]  Christine Uber Grosse,et al.  Managing Communication within Virtual Intercultural Teams , 2002 .

[37]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Managers' upward influence tactic strategies: the role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style , 2003 .

[38]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  A comparison of influence strategies utilized by managers in American and Japanese organizations , 1986 .

[39]  Ryh-Song Yeh.  Downward influence styles in cultural diversity settings , 1995 .

[40]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. , 1990 .

[41]  Pep Simo,et al.  The frequency of the dyadic influence tactics according to communication media , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[43]  Ronald J. Deluga.  The Effects of Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez Faire Leadership Characteristics on Subordinate Influencing Behavior , 1990 .

[44]  B. Barry,et al.  The Medium and the Message: The Adaptive Use of Communication Media in Dyadic Influence , 2004 .

[45]  Venkat R. Krishnan,et al.  Impact of transformational leadership on followers’ influence strategies , 2004 .

[46]  Carolyn I. Chavez,et al.  Validation of the extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire , 2008 .

[47]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Influence Tactics Used for Different Objectives with Subordinates, Peers, and Superiors , 1995 .

[48]  Ann-Marie Rizzo,et al.  Making Things Happen in Organizations: Does Gender Make a Difference? , 1988 .