Forecasting Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Using a Semiparametric Approach Based on the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution

Value at Risk (VaR) forecasts can be produced from conditional autoregressive VaR models, estimated using quantile regression. Quantile modeling avoids a distributional assumption, and allows the dynamics of the quantiles to differ for each probability level. However, by focusing on a quantile, these models provide no information regarding expected shortfall (ES), which is the expectation of the exceedances beyond the quantile. We introduce a method for predicting ES corresponding to VaR forecasts produced by quantile regression models. It is well known that quantile regression is equivalent to maximum likelihood based on an asymmetric Laplace (AL) density. We allow the density's scale to be time-varying, and show that it can be used to estimate conditional ES. This enables a joint model of conditional VaR and ES to be estimated by maximizing an AL log-likelihood. Although this estimation framework uses an AL density, it does not rely on an assumption for the returns distribution. We also use the AL log-likelihood for forecast evaluation, and show that it is strictly consistent for the joint evaluation of VaR and ES. Empirical illustration is provided using stock index data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

[1]  Michael Curran.  Backtesting Expected Shortfall , 2014 .

[2]  A. McNeil,et al.  Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach , 2000 .

[3]  A. Raftery,et al.  Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation , 2007 .

[4]  Tilmann Gneiting,et al.  Expected Shortfall is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk - Implications for backtesting , 2015, 1507.00244.

[5]  R. Koenker.  Quantile Regression: Name Index , 2005 .

[6]  DuZaichao,et al.  Backtesting Expected Shortfall , 2017 .

[7]  R. Engle,et al.  CAViaR , 1999 .

[8]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Forecasting Value-at-Risk Using Nonlinear Regression Quantiles and the Intra-day Range , 2011 .

[9]  Ivana Komunjer,et al.  Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles , 2005 .

[10]  C. Goodhart,et al.  An academic response to Basel II , 2001 .

[11]  T. Gneiting.  Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts , 2009, 0912.0902.

[12]  R. Koenker,et al.  Pessimistic Portfolio Allocation and Choquet Expected Utility , 2004 .

[13]  Tae-Hwan Kim,et al.  VAR for VaR: Measuring Tail Dependence Using Multivariate Regression Quantiles , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Simone Manganelli,et al.  Value at Risk Models in Finance , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Ivana Komunjer,et al.  Asymmetric power distribution: Theory and applications to risk measurement , 2007 .

[16]  Cathy W. S. Chen,et al.  Bayesian Time-Varying Quantile Forecasting for Value-at-Risk in Financial Markets , 2011 .

[17]  Converting Tail-VaR to VaR: An Econometric Study , 2012 .

[18]  Ivana Komunjer,et al.  Evaluation and Combination of Conditional Quantile Forecasts , 2002 .

[19]  R. Koenker,et al.  Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression , 1999 .

[20]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[21]  Qian Chen,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis Bayesian Value-at-risk and Expected Shortfall Forecasting via the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution , 2022 .

[22]  Hohsuk Noh,et al.  Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models , 2014 .

[23]  Halbert White,et al.  Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability , 2003 .

[24]  James W. Taylor.  Using Exponentially Weighted Quantile Regression to Estimate Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall , 2008 .

[25]  P. Embrechts,et al.  An Academic Response to Basel 3.5 , 2014 .

[26]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Quantile regression , 2019, Nature Methods.

[27]  D. Tasche,et al.  On the coherence of expected shortfall , 2001, cond-mat/0104295.

[28]  Todd E. Clark,et al.  Testing for Unconditional Predictive Ability , 2010 .

[29]  Sylvain Sardy,et al.  Extreme-Quantile Tracking for Financial Time Series , 2014 .

[30]  L. Mengütürk,et al.  Ranking the Predictive Performances of Value-at-Risk Estimation Methods , 2010 .

[31]  Johanna F. Ziegel,et al.  Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle , 2015, 1503.08123.