Characterising the Spatial and Temporal Activities of Free-Ranging Cows from GPS Data

Electronic tracking provides a unique way to document behaviour by cows on a continuous basis. Over 2 years 17 beef cows with calves were fitted with global positioning system (GPS) devices programmed to record uncorrected GPS locations at 1-s intervals in a semi-desert rangeland. Each cow was periodically observed during daylight hours and foraging, walking and stationary (standing/lying) activity times were recorded across days and individual cows to calculate a mean travel rate for each activity. Data without observers present were collected immediately preceding and following the abrupt weaning of calves at between 223 and 234 days of age to evaluate the potential of classifying various travel rates into foraging, walking and stationary activity. The three activities were further characterised within a 24-h period based on the sun’s angle with respect to the horizon. Only data from cows whose equipment acquired ≥ 90% of the potential GPS positional data among consecutive days were analysed. Due to problems with the equipment, data from two cows in 2009 and two cows in 2011 met these criteria. The interval evaluated consisted of four 24-h periods before abrupt weaning and seven 24-h periods following weaning. Results suggested that uncorrected 1-s positional GPS data are satisfactory to classify the behaviour by free-ranging beef cows into foraging, walking and stationary activities. Furthermore, abrupt weaning caused cows to change their spatial and temporal behaviour across and within days. Overall, travel by cows increased post-weaning with subtle within-day behavioural changes. Further research will be required to fully understand the biological importance of spatio-temporal behaviour to optimise cattle and landscape management goals.

[1]  Werner Härdtle,et al.  Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: A GPS/GIS assessment , 2008 .

[2]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf: 2. Separation at 1 day and 2 weeks after birth. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[3]  B. Thierry,et al.  Decision-making processes in group departures of cattle. , 2009 .

[4]  Vilis O. Nams,et al.  Fractal analysis measures habitat use at different spatial scales: an example with American marten , 2004 .

[5]  E. Price,et al.  Fenceline contact of beef calves with their dams at weaning reduces the negative effects of separation on behavior and growth rate. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[6]  R. Sallabanks,et al.  Hierarchical Mechanisms of Fruit Selection by an Avian Frugivore , 1993 .

[7]  Zhihai He,et al.  A terrestrial animal-borne video system for large mammals , 2009 .

[8]  Ivan Andonovic,et al.  Statistical Interaction Modeling of Bovine Herd Behaviors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  Andreas Buerkert,et al.  Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats' grazing behaviour , 2009 .

[10]  K. Havstad,et al.  Introduction, structure and function of a Chihuahuan desert ecosystem: the jornada basin long-term ecological research site , 2012 .

[11]  A. Dolev,et al.  Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: Use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[12]  Anderson Tools to study and manage grazing behavior at multiple scales to enhance the sustainability of livestock production systems , 2011 .

[13]  James P. S. Neel,et al.  Original papers: Acoustic monitoring system to quantify ingestive behavior of free-grazing cattle , 2011 .

[14]  R. Ungerfeld,et al.  Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review , 2011, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[15]  J. G. Moorefield Grazing Habits of Cattle in a Mixed-Prairie Pasture. , 1951 .

[16]  M. Špinka,et al.  Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: Effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation , 2008 .

[17]  Trent L McDonald,et al.  Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%. , 2009, Ecology.

[18]  P. August,et al.  GPS for environmental applications: accuracy and precision of locational data , 1994 .

[19]  S. Garcia,et al.  Lactation curves of autumn- and spring-calved cows in pasture-based dairy systems , 2001 .

[20]  R. Rempel,et al.  Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system , 1997 .

[21]  R. Ungerfeld,et al.  The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves , 2010 .

[22]  D. Peters,et al.  Plant communities in the Jornada Basin: the dynamic landscape , 2012 .

[23]  M. Systems IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part C, Applications and reviews , 1998 .

[24]  D. Haley The behavioural response of cattle (Bos taurus) to artificial weaning in two stages , 2006 .

[25]  Ross Purves,et al.  How fast is a cow? Cross‐Scale Analysis of Movement Data , 2011, Trans. GIS.

[26]  K. Pister,et al.  Wireless Inertial Sensors for Monitoring Animal Behavior , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  D. B. Johnstone-Wallace,et al.  Grazing management practices and their relationship to the behaviour and grazing habits of cattle , 1944, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[28]  Dean M. Anderson,et al.  Virtual fencing--past, present and future , 2007 .

[29]  Piccione Giuseppe,et al.  Biological rhythm in livestock. , 2002 .

[30]  T. Herring THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM , 1996 .

[31]  Stanley M Tomkiewicz,et al.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  D. Weary,et al.  Understanding weaning distress , 2008 .

[33]  I. Hulbert,et al.  The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping , 2001 .

[34]  M H Andrew,et al.  Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  B. Cargnelutti,et al.  Use of GPS activity sensors to measure active and inactive behaviours of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 2010 .

[36]  Marek Špinka,et al.  Graded leadership by dominant animals in a herd of female beef cattle on pasture , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. Heurich,et al.  New Possibilities of Observing Animal Behaviour from a Distance Using Activity Sensors in Gps-Collars: An Attempt to Calibrate Remotely Collected Activity Data with Direct Behavioural Observations in Red Deer Cervus elaphus , 2009 .

[38]  Tim Wark,et al.  Using high fix rate GPS data to determine the relationships between fix rate, prediction errors and patch selection , 2008 .

[39]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[40]  W. A. Low,et al.  The influence of environment on daily maintenance behaviour of free-ranging Shorthorn cows in central Australia. I. General introduction and descriptive analysis of day-long activities , 1981 .

[41]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Identifying Walking Trips Using GPS Data. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[42]  David Ganskopp,et al.  GPS Collar Sampling Frequency: Effects on Measures of Resource Use , 2008 .

[43]  E. Schlecht,et al.  The use of differentially corrected global positioning system to monitor activities of cattle at pasture , 2004 .

[44]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[45]  L. Lidfors,et al.  Suckling in Free‐ranging Beef Cattle — Temporal Patterning of Suckling Bouts and Effects of Age and Sex , 2010 .

[46]  L. Bender,et al.  Contrasting Observation and Transect-Based Models of Cattle Distribution on Lincoln National Forest, New Mexico , 2011 .

[47]  Ying Guo,et al.  Using accelerometer, high sample rate GPS and magnetometer data to develop a cattle movement and behaviour model , 2009 .

[48]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. 1. Separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after birth. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[49]  D. Bryant The ecological basis of behaviour , 1989 .

[50]  D. Weary,et al.  Maternal behavior in cattle , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[51]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[52]  I. Veissier,et al.  The use of circadian behaviour to measure adaptation of calves to changes in their environment , 1989 .

[53]  J. A. Lines,et al.  A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems , 1997 .

[54]  John B. Wright,et al.  Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States , 2007 .

[55]  K D Farnsworth,et al.  How Do Grazers Achieve Their Distribution? A Continuum of Models from Random Diffusion to the Ideal Free Distribution Using Biased Random Walks , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[56]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Data‐driven identification of group dynamics for motion prediction and control , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[57]  Giuseppe Piccione,et al.  Biological rhythm in livestock. , 2002, Journal of veterinary science.

[58]  C. Muller,et al.  Effect of shade on various parameters of Friesian cows in a Mediterranean climate in South Africa. 3. Behaviour , 1994 .

[59]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Robust classification of animal tracking data , 2007 .

[60]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[62]  Klaus Manfred Scheibe,et al.  Application testing of a new three-dimensional acceleration measuring system with wireless data transfer (WAS) for behavior analysis , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[63]  G. W. Arnold,et al.  Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals. , 1979 .

[64]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  Mohamed N. El-Derini,et al.  GAC: Energy-Efficient Hybrid GPS-Accelerometer-Compass GSM Localization , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[66]  D. Ganskopp,et al.  Effects of Early Weaning on Cow Performance, Grazing Behavior, and Winter Feed Costs in the Intermountain West1 , 2008 .

[67]  K. Houpt,et al.  Ingestive behavior. , 1990, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[68]  D. Ganskopp,et al.  Least-effort pathways?: a GIS analysis of livestock trails in rugged terrain. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.