Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector

Environmental factors add complexity to the comparison between specific activities or entire entities. Decision making units with an inferior performance are tempted to invoke that their organization is different from the others in the data set. By reinterpreting and extending the metafrontier literature, we propose an all-embracing concept to fully capture the operational environment. We suggest the ‘Group Specific Technical Efficiency’ as a new measure to assess the overall efficiency of a utility while allowing for environmental differences. A real-world example of drinking water utilies out of 5 different countries illustrates the concept.

[1]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Public Enterprise Economics.@@@The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement. , 1987 .

[2]  Brian Dollery,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in Australian Local Government: The Case of New South Wales Municipal Water Services , 2004 .

[3]  George E. Battese,et al.  Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function , 2002 .

[4]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[5]  Diane P. Dupont,et al.  Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Municipal Water Suppliers: The Role of Environmental Factors , 2009, Land Economics.

[6]  Giulio Palomba,et al.  Testing similarities of short-run inflation dynamics among EU-25 countries after the Euro , 2009 .

[7]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[8]  W. Groot,et al.  The efficiency of education in generating literacy: a stochastic frontier approach , 2010 .

[9]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[10]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study , 2004 .

[11]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Decomposing school and school-type efficiency , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[13]  J. Florens,et al.  Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach , 2002 .

[14]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[15]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[16]  G. Fraquelli,et al.  Public utility planning and cost efficiency in a decentralized regulation context: the case of the Italian integrated water service , 2011 .

[17]  Hiroshi Morita,et al.  Analysis of economies of scope by data envelopment analysis: comparison of efficient frontiers , 2003 .

[18]  David S. Saal,et al.  Is a little sunshine all we need? On the impact of sunshine regulation on profits, productivity and prices in the Dutch drinking water sector , 2008 .

[19]  R. Marques,et al.  Designing Incentives in Local Public Utilities: An International Comparison of the Drinking Water Sector , 2007 .

[20]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[21]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[22]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .