Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection

We have used the anterograde axon tracer 1,1′-dioctodecyl-3,3,3′,3′- tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (Dil) to characterize the development of topographic order in the rat retinocollicular projection. Retinal axons were labeled by Dil injections covering 0.15– 2% of peripheral temporal, nasal, superior, or inferior retina, or more central retina, in rats ranging in age from embryonic day 20 to postnatal day (P) 19. At P11-P12 and later, such injections label retinal axons that form overlapping arbors restricted to a topographically correct terminal zone covering about 1% of the superior colliculus (SC) area. At perinatal ages, though, axons labeled from each retinal site are distributed in the SC over much of its medial- lateral axis and extend caudally well beyond the rostral-caudal location of their correct terminal zone; some continue caudally into the inferior colliculus. Axons typically form side branches and often arborize at topographically incorrect positions throughout the SC; however, they appear to branch preferentially in a region that includes, but is much larger than, their correct terminal zone. The mature, retinotopically ordered projection emerges during an early postnatal remodeling period through the rapid remodeling of the early, diffuse projection. This process involves the large-scale removal of axons, axon segments, branches, and arbors from topographically inappropriate positions concurrently with a dramatic increase in branching and arborization at topographically correct locations. Quantitative measurements show that elimination of aberrant branches without loss of the primary axons contributes substantially to the development of order. By P6, fewer mistargeted axons persist, but those that do persist tend to branch or arborize more extensively in topographically inappropriate regions. By P8, the labeling patterns begin to approximate those seen at maturity. Further refinement leads to an adultlike topographic ordering of axonal arborizations by P11- P12. At maturity, some axons take very indirect routes to reach their correct terminal zone. However, such trajectory changes typically correct only small positional inaccuracies, indicating that axons and axon segments that make larger targeting errors do not survive the remodeling phase. Previous retrograde labeling studies indicate that some retinal axons make topographic targeting errors (O'Leary et al., 1986; Yhip and Kirby, 1990), but none have suggested the degree of diffuseness revealed by anterograde labeling with Dil. Our findings show that directed axon growth is inadequate as a mechanism to develop the topographic ordering of retinal axons in the rat SC. Rather, mechanisms that control the removal of mistargeted axons and promote the arborization of correctly positioned axons are critical for the development of retinotopic order.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  D. Frost Axonal growth and target selection during development: retinal projections to the ventrobasal complex and other “nonvisual” structures in neonatal Syrian hamsters , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  J Walter,et al.  Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro. , 1987, Development.

[3]  P. Godement,et al.  Cross-species recognition of tectal cues by retinal fibers in vitro. , 1989, Development.

[4]  C A Stuermer,et al.  Trajectories of regenerating retinal axons in the goldfish tectum: II. Exploratory branches and growth cones on axons at early regeneration stages , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Martha Constantine-Paton,et al.  A cell surface molecule distributed in a dorsoventral gradient in the perinatal rat retina , 1986, Nature.

[6]  P. Raymond,et al.  Developing retinotectal projection in larval goldfish , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  C. Shatz,et al.  Prenatal development of individual retinogeniculate axons during the period of segregation , 1984, Nature.

[8]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Inaccuracies in initial growth and arborization of chick retinotectal axons followed by course corrections and axon remodeling to develop topographic order , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  W M Cowan,et al.  Topographic targeting errors in the retinocollicular projection and their elimination by selective ganglion cell death , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Takeo Kato,et al.  Transient retinal fibers to the inferior colliculus in the newborn albino rat , 1983, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  R. Lund Uncrossed Visual Pathways of Hooded and Albino Rats , 1965, Science.

[12]  A J Sefton,et al.  Loss of axons from the optic nerve of the rat during early postnatal development. , 1982, Brain research.

[13]  H Fujisawa,et al.  Mode of growth of retinal axons within the tectum of Xenopus tadpoles, and implications in the ordered neuronal connection between the retina and the tectum , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  M Nirenberg,et al.  A topographic gradient of molecules in retina can be used to identify neuron position. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Trisler,et al.  Corresponding spatial gradients of TOP molecules in the developing retina and optic tectum. , 1987, Science.

[16]  M. Dubin,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells , 1988 .

[17]  M. G. Honig,et al.  Fluorescent carbocyanine dyes allow living neurons of identified origin to be studied in long-term cultures , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  W M Cowan,et al.  Changes in the numbers of optic nerve fibers during late prenatal and postnatal development in the albino rat. , 1985, Brain research.

[19]  B. Finlay,et al.  Cell death in the mammalian visual system during normal development: II. Superior colliculus , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  C. Barnstable,et al.  Developmental regulation of ganglioside antigens recognized by the JONES antibody , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  SC McLoon,et al.  A monoclonal antibody that distinguishes between temporal and nasal retinal axons , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Murphey,et al.  Map formation in the developing Xenopus retinotectal system: an examination of ganglion cell terminal arborizations , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The evolution of the retinotectal map during development in Xenopus , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  C. Barnstable,et al.  A developmentally regulated antigen associated with neural cell and process migration , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  Glen Jeffery,et al.  Retinotopic order appears before ocular separation in developing visual pathways , 1985, Nature.

[26]  R. Linden,et al.  Massive retinotectal projection in rats , 1983, Brain Research.

[27]  B. Dreher,et al.  The loss of ganglion cells in the developing retina of the rat. , 1982, Brain research.

[28]  V S Caviness,et al.  Postnatal changes in arborization patterns of murine retinocollicular axons , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  A. M. Cooper,et al.  Retinal topography of the neonatal crossed aberrant exuberant projection to the inferior colliculus in the pigmented rat , 1990, Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Holt,et al.  Does timing of axon outgrowth influence initial retinotectal topography in Xenopus? , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Linden,et al.  Postnatal changes in retinal ganglion cell and optic axon populations in the pigmented rat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Limited topographic specificity in the targeting and branching of mammalian retinal axons. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[33]  M. G. Honig,et al.  Dil and DiO: versatile fluorescent dyes for neuronal labelling and pathway tracing , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  J. Vielmetter,et al.  Goldfish retinal axons respond to position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes in vitro , 1989, Neuron.

[35]  William A. Harris,et al.  Order in the initial retinotectal map in Xenopus: a new technique for labelling growing nerve fibres , 1983, Nature.

[36]  S. Henke-Fahle,et al.  Avoidance of posterior tectal membranes by temporal retinal axons. , 1987, Development.

[37]  L. Kruger,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the visual projection to the superior colliculus of the rat , 1966, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  M. Kirby,et al.  Topographic organization of the retinocollicular projection in the neonatal rat , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[39]  R. Lund,et al.  Prenatal development of the optic projection in albino and hooded rats. , 1983, Brain research.

[40]  Alfred Gierer,et al.  Directional cues for growing axons forming the retinotectal projection , 1987 .

[41]  B. Finlay,et al.  Cell death in the mammalian visual system during normal development: I. Retinal ganglion cells , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  C A Stuermer,et al.  Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Dynamic changes in optic fiber terminal arbors lead to retinotopic map formation: An in vivo confocal microscopic study , 1990, Neuron.