A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BackgroundMost of the expense of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is incurred while the patient is in the operation room; however, heretofore there has been no critical analysis of the time required to perform the various steps of the operation. An understanding of how operative time is used is the first step toward improving the efficiency of the procedure and decreasing costs while maintaining an acceptable standard of care.MethodsOf 194 patients undergoing LC at a university hospital between 1994 and 1997, operational videotapes of 48 randomly chosen patients were reviewed. Three groups of patients were identified: those undergoing LC for chronic cholecystitis (n=27), those undergoing LC for acute cholecystitis (n=11), and those with common bile duct stones (CBDS), (n=10) undergoing LC with transcystic common bile duct exploration. The procedure was divided into the following seven steps; trocar entry, laparoscopic ultrasound, dissection of the triangle of Calot, cholangiogram, dissection of the gallbladder, extraction of the gallbladder, and irrigation-aspiration with removal of ports. Time spent for camera cleaning, bleeding control, and insertion of the cholangiocatheter into the cystic duct was also calculated. The groups were compared in terms of time spent for each step using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.ResultsThe mean±SD operating time was 66.5±20.5 min. The acute group had the longest operating time, followed by the CBDS and chronic groups. Dissection of the gallbladder, insertion of the cholangiocatheter, and irrigation-aspiration were longer steps in the acute group than in the other groups (p<0.05). Dissection of the triangle of Calot took longer in acute cholecystitis than in chronic cholecystitis (p<0.05). CBDS cases took longer (p<0.05) than chronic cases because stone extraction added an average of 17.5 min to the time required for the cholangiogram in chronic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic ultrasound took longer in the CBDS group than in the other groups (p<0.05). The mean ± SD time spent for the cholangiogram and laparoscopic ultrasound in chronic cholecystitis was 7.5±4.3 and 4.8±1.9 min, respectively.ConclusionsThis time analysis study demonstrates that acute cholecystitis requires a longer operating time because most of the individual steps in the procedure take longer. In patients with choledocholithiasis, stone extraction was responsible for longer operating times. This study should serve as a basis for future studies focusing on time utilization in laparoscopic surgery.

[1]  B. Sigel,et al.  Technique of ultrasound examination during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1993, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[3]  C. Vara-Thorbeck,et al.  Common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its treatment , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  F. Largiadèr,et al.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography during cholecystectomy , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  L W Way,et al.  The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1992, Archives of surgery.

[6]  S. Rogers,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography in 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  D. Jones,et al.  The current management of common bile duct stones. , 1996, Advances in surgery.

[8]  R. Jones,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. , 1991, Annals of surgery.

[9]  D. Hashimoto,et al.  Development of a fogless scope and its analysis using infrared radiation pyrometer , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  P. Cisek,et al.  The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[11]  W. Melvin,et al.  Laparoscopic skills enhancement. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[12]  J. Hiatt,et al.  Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[13]  J. Barkin,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis. , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  W W Hurd,et al.  There's a hole in my bucket: the cost of disposable instruments. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  J. Hiatt,et al.  Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  S. Peter,et al.  Cholecystectomy without Operative Cholangiography. , 2011 .

[17]  J. Hunter,et al.  Standardizing laparoscopic procedure time and determining the effect of patient age/gender and presence or absence of surgical residents during operation , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  C. Lo,et al.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[19]  R. Crolla,et al.  [Complication rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy not different for residents in training and surgeons]. , 1997, Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.