It May be Social, But Why is it Capital? The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language

Although the referents of the term social capital merit sustained inquiry, the term impedes understanding because of the historical association of the word capital with economic discourse. As a result of this association, applying the term social capital to civic engagement blurs crucial analytic distinctions. Moreover, there are important ideological consequences to considering things such as bowling leagues to be a form of capital and urging citizens to become social capitalists. The term social capacity, the authors argue, provides the same heuristic benefits as the term social capital without extending illusory promises of theoretical parsimony with the financial/human/social capital trinity.

[1]  T. Lowi.  A Review of Herbert Simon's Review of My View of the Discipline , 1993 .

[2]  C. Macrae.  ‘Trust — the social virtues and the creation of prosperity’ , 2000 .

[3]  The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. , 1979 .

[4]  Theodore J. Lowi,et al.  The State in Political Science: How We Became What We Study , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Racial Income Differences , 1976 .

[6]  Karl Marx,et al.  Wage Labour and Capital , 1849 .

[7]  Hegemony, Consciousness, and Political Change in Peru , 1991 .

[8]  Cho Jungah,et al.  Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1997 .

[9]  Ralf Dahrendorf,et al.  Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society , 1960 .

[10]  Howard Coonley,et al.  Making democracy work , 1941, Electrical Engineering.

[11]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Social Capital and the Political Economy of Our Discontent , 1997 .

[12]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  The Distribution of Power in American Society , 1957, World Politics.

[13]  R. Putnam.  Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[14]  D. Swartz.  Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu , 1998 .

[15]  Herbert Marcuse.  One-Dimensional Man , 1964 .

[16]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[17]  B. Kiker.  Investment in human capital , 1971 .

[18]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[19]  Frank A. Fetter,et al.  The Nature of Capital and Income , 1907, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  D. McNally.  Language, History, and Class Struggle , 1995 .

[21]  M. W. Foley,et al.  Civil Society and Social Capital Beyond Putnam , 1998 .

[22]  Saul David Alinsky,et al.  Reveille for Radicals , 1946 .

[23]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[24]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Why Should We Care about Group Inequality? , 1987, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[25]  A. Hirschman,et al.  The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph , 1977 .

[26]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[27]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Nature of Capital and Income , 1965 .

[28]  E. Goldberg,et al.  Thinking about how Democracy Works , 1996 .