Social Networking in Online Support Groups for Health: How Online Social Networking Benefits Patients

An increasing number of online support groups (OSGs) have embraced the features of social networking. So far, little is known about how patients use and benefit from these features. By implementing the uses-and-gratifications framework, the author conducted an online survey with current users of OSGs to examine associations among motivation, use of specific features of OSG, and support outcomes. Findings suggest that OSG users make selective use of varied features depending on their needs, and that perceptions of receiving emotional and informational support are associated more with the use of some features than others. For example, those with strong motivation for social interaction use diverse features of OSG and make one-to-one connections with other users by friending. In contrast, those with strong motivation for information seeking limit their use primarily to discussion boards. Results also show that online social networking features, such as friending and sharing of personal stories on blogs, are helpful in satisfying the need for emotional support. The present study sheds light on online social networking features in the context of health-related OSGs and provides practical lessons on how to improve the capacity of OSGs to serve the needs of their users.

[1]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[2]  D. Campbell Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. , 1960 .

[3]  F. Riessman The “Helper” Therapy Principle , 1965 .

[4]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[5]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[6]  Sharon Riedel,et al.  Modes of social support: The social support behaviors (SS-B) scale , 1987 .

[7]  N. Krause,et al.  Satisfaction with social support and depressive symptoms: a panel analysis. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[8]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. , 1990 .

[9]  E. Midlarsky,et al.  Helping as coping. , 1991 .

[10]  B. Penninx,et al.  Effects of social support and personal coping resources on depressive symptoms: different for various chronic diseases? , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  D H Gustafson,et al.  The quality of interactive computer use among HIV-infected individuals. , 1998, Journal of health communication.

[12]  S. Steginga,et al.  Evaluation of a peer support program for women with breast cancer—lessons for practitioners , 1999 .

[13]  Vincent R. Waldron,et al.  Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. , 1999, Health communication.

[14]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[15]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[17]  R. Kessler,et al.  Invisible support and adjustment to stress. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  On-Line with the Friends of Bill W: Social Support and the Net , 2000 .

[19]  P. Reeves Coping in Cyberspace: The Impact of Internet Use on the Ability of HIV-Positive Individuals to Deal with Their Illness , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[20]  J. Grube,et al.  Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support , 2001 .

[21]  R. Turner,et al.  A longitudinal study of the role and significance of mattering to others for depressive symptoms. , 2001, Journal of health and social behavior.

[22]  Ali Montazeri,et al.  Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients before and after participation in a cancer support group. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[23]  J. Preece,et al.  Experiencing Empathy Online , 2001 .

[24]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The internet and health communication : experience and expectations , 2001 .

[25]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[26]  A. Rubin The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. , 2002 .

[27]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond Hearing : Where Real-World and Online Support Meet , 2002 .

[28]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Do Internet-Based Support Interventions Change Perceptions of Social Support?: An Experimental Trial of Approaches for Supporting Diabetes Self-Management , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[29]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Motives for communication within on‐line support groups and antecedents for interpersonal use , 2002 .

[30]  John Noell,et al.  Evaluation of an Internet-based smoking cessation program: lessons learned from a pilot study. , 2003 .

[31]  Keith Stamm,et al.  Communities of Care and Caring: The Case of MSWatch.com® , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[32]  Scott E. Caplan A Theory of Problematic Internet Use and Psychosocial Well-Being , 2003 .

[33]  Amiram D Vinokur,et al.  Providing Social Support May Be More Beneficial Than Receiving It , 2003, Psychological science.

[34]  Johannes Siegrist,et al.  Reported nonreciprocity of social exchange and depressive symptoms. Extending the model of effort-reward imbalance beyond work. , 2003, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[35]  James D. Robinson,et al.  Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Social Support: Cancer and Older Adults , 2003, Health communication.

[36]  Ross Mayfield Social Network Dynamics and Participatory Politics by Ross Mayfield , 2004 .

[37]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  L. S. Baum Internet parent support groups for primary caregivers of a child with special health care needs. , 2004, Pediatric nursing.

[39]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  What lurkers and posters think of each other [online community] , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[40]  G. Cooper,et al.  Exploring and Understanding Online Assistance for Problem Gamblers: The Pathways Disclosure Model , 2004 .

[41]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[42]  J. Lasker,et al.  The Role of an Online Community for People With a Rare Disease: Content Analysis of Messages Posted on a Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Mailinglist , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[43]  Diane J Catellier,et al.  Low Perceived Social Support and Post–Myocardial Infarction Prognosis in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Clinical Trial: The Effects of Treatment , 2005, Psychosomatic medicine.

[44]  Neil S. Coulson,et al.  Receiving Social Support Online: An Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Support Group for Individuals Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Internet Community Group Participation: Psychosocial Benefits for Women with Breast Cancer , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[46]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[47]  David B Buller,et al.  Attributes of Interactive Online Health Information Systems , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[48]  George Demiris,et al.  The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[49]  Binod Sundararajan,et al.  Multinational web uses and gratifications: Measuring the social impact of online community participation across national boundaries , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[50]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Designing and implementing virtual patient support communities: A German case study , 2006 .

[51]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  Effects of Insightful Disclosure Within Computer Mediated Support Groups on Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Health communication.

[52]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  The role of virtual communities for the social network of cancer patients , 2006, AMCIS.

[53]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[54]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[55]  M. Dutta,et al.  Health Orientation and Disease State as Predictors of Online Health Support Group Use , 2007, Health communication.

[56]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[57]  Christopher E. Beaudoin,et al.  Benefiting from Social Capital in Online Support Groups: An Empirical Study of Cancer Patients , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[58]  B. Rimer,et al.  How Cancer Survivors Provide Support on Cancer-Related Internet Mailing Lists , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[59]  N. Coulson,et al.  Accessing dental anxiety online support groups: an exploratory qualitative study of motives and experiences. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[60]  James Stewart,et al.  Doctor-patient relationship as motivation and outcome: Examining uses of an Interactive Cancer Communication System , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[61]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[62]  Brett A. Bumgarner,et al.  You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults , 2007, First Monday.

[63]  Pavica Sheldon,et al.  The Relationship Between Unwillingness-to-Communicate and Students' Facebook Use , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[64]  John Suler,et al.  Fostering empowerment in online support groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Sumaira Malik,et al.  Computer-mediated infertility support groups: an exploratory study of online experiences. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[66]  Chris Barker,et al.  Outcome of an Online Mutual Support Group for College Students with Psychological Problems , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  S. Sagar,et al.  Chinese medicine and biomodulation in cancer patients—Part one , 2008, Current oncology.

[68]  C. V. van Uden-Kraan,et al.  Self-Reported Differences in Empowerment Between Lurkers and Posters in Online Patient Support Groups , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[69]  J.L. Bender,et al.  Supporting cancer patients through the continuum of care: a view from the age of social networks and computer-mediated communication , 2008, Current oncology.

[70]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  J. Sarasohn-Kahn The Wisdom of Patients: Health Care Meets Online Social Media , 2008 .

[72]  Martin Tanis,et al.  Health-Related On-Line Forums: What's the Big Attraction? , 2008, Journal of health communication.

[73]  Jessie E Saul,et al.  Utilization of Smoking Cessation Informational, Interactive, and Online Community Resources as Predictors of Abstinence: Cohort Study , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[74]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[75]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[76]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[77]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Empowering Processes and Outcomes of Participation in Online Support Groups for Patients With Breast Cancer, Arthritis, or Fibromyalgia , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[78]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  Ellen L. Rubenstein Dimensions of information exchange in an online breast cancer support group , 2009, ASIST.

[80]  G. Seçkin Internet Technology in Service of Personal Health Care Management: Patient Perspective , 2009 .

[81]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  Unraveling Uses and Effects of an Interactive Health Communication System , 2009, Journal of broadcasting & electronic media.

[83]  FRAGMENTED INTIMACY: ADDICTION IN A SOCIAL WORLD , 2009 .

[84]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Potential Benefits and Harms of a Peer Support Social Network Service on the Internet for People With Depressive Tendencies: Qualitative Content Analysis and Social Network Analysis , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[85]  Martin Tanis Online social support groups , 2009 .

[86]  Pavica Sheldon "I'll poke you. You'll poke me!" Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships , 2009 .

[87]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  FEATURESocial network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities , 2009, INTR.

[88]  G. n Internet Technology in Service of Personal Health Care Management: Patient Perspective , 2009 .

[89]  David E. Goodrich,et al.  An Online Community Improves Adherence in an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[90]  Elmer V. Bernstam,et al.  Social support in an Internet weight loss community , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[91]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[92]  Neil S. Coulson,et al.  Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of 'lurkers' and 'posters' , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[93]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  How Does Insightful and Emotional Disclosure Bring Potential Health Benefits?: Study Based on Online Support Groups for Women with Breast Cancer. , 2011, The Journal of communication.

[94]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Online health consultation: Examining uses of an interactive cancer communication tool by low-income women with breast cancer , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[95]  Debra Lauterbach,et al.  It's not that i don't have problems, i'm just not putting them on facebook: challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health , 2011, CSCW.

[96]  Paul M. Haridakis Uses and Gratifications , 2012, An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research.

[97]  Abraham Maslow,et al.  Uses and Gratifications , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.