Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis.

Biological motion perception is referred to as the ability to recognize a moving human figure from no more than a few moving point lights. Such point-light stimuli contain limited form information about the shape of the body and local image motion signals from the moving points. The contributions of form and motion to the vivid perception of point-light displays are subject to controversy in the discussion. While some studies claim that local motion signals are critical, others emphasize the role of global form cues. Here, we present a template-matching approach to investigate the role of global form analysis. We used a template-matching method that derives biological motion exclusively from form information. The algorithm used static postures monitored from walking humans as stored templates. We compared the simulation results to psychophysical experiments with the commonly used point-light walker and a variant point-light walker with near-absent local motion signals. The common result in all experiments was a high correlation between simulation results and psychophysical data. The results show that the limited form information in point-light stimuli might be sufficient to perceive biological motion. We suggest that it is possible for humans to extract the sparse form information in point-light walkers and to use it to perceive biological motion by integrating dynamic form information over time.

[1]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[2]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[3]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[5]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Cutting Coding Theory Adapted to Gait Perception , 1981 .

[7]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[8]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  W. Dittrich Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[10]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[11]  George Sperling,et al.  Attention-generated apparent motion , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Sheba Heptulla Chatterjee,et al.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception , 1996, Nature.

[14]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[16]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  F. Pollick,et al.  Recognising the style of spatially exaggerated tennis , 2001 .

[18]  Vic Braden,et al.  Recognising the Style of Spatially Exaggerated Tennis Serves , 2001, Perception.

[19]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[21]  N. Troje Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[23]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Morphable Models for the Analysis and Synthesis of Complex Motion Patterns , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Jason Lee,et al.  A stochastic model for the detection of coherent motion , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[27]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  N. Troje,et al.  Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Antonino Casile,et al.  Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[30]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.