A receptionist robot for Brazilian people: study on interaction involving illiterates

Abstract The receptionist job, consisting in providing useful indications to visitors in a public office, is one possible employment of social robots. The design and the behaviour of robots expected to be integrated in human societies are crucial issues, and they are dependent on the culture and society in which the robot should be deployed. We study the factors that could be used in the design of a receptionist robot in Brazil, a country with a mix of races and considerable gaps in economic and educational level. This inequality results in the presence of functional illiterate people, unable to use reading, writing and numeracy skills. We invited Brazilian people, including a group of functionally illiterate subjects, to interact with two types of receptionists differing in physical appearance (agent v mechanical robot) and in the sound of the voice (human like v mechanical). Results gathered during the interactions point out a preference for the agent, for the human-like voice and a more intense reaction to stimuli by illiterates. These results provide useful indications that should be considered when designing a receptionist robot, as well as insights on the effect of illiteracy in the interaction.

[1]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[2]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[4]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[6]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Development of Whole-Body Emotional Expression Humanoid Robot for ADL-Assistive RT Services , 2011, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[8]  José Mario De Martino,et al.  Facial animation based on context-dependent visemes , 2006, Comput. Graph..

[9]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Getting Lost in Buildings , 2010 .

[10]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  YARP: Yet Another Robot Platform , 2006 .

[11]  Rebecca Q. Stafford,et al.  Robots with Display Screens: A Robot with a More Humanlike Face Display Is Perceived To Have More Mind and a Better Personality , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Atsushi Araki,et al.  Relationship Between Mechadroid Type C3 and Human Beings Based on Physiognomic Features , 2010, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[14]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[15]  S. L. See,et al.  The influence of voice pitch on the evaluation of a social robot receptionist , 2011, 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr ).

[16]  Taezoon Park,et al.  Understanding Communication Patterns for Designing Robot Receptionist , 2010, ICSR.

[17]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Designing robots for long-term social interaction , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  W. Balée.  The Brazilian People: The Formation and Meaning of Brazil , 2003 .

[19]  David Harman,et al.  Illiteracy: An Overview , 1970 .

[20]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[22]  Jean-Claude Burgelman.  Assessing information technologies and telecommunications services: the case of developing countries , 1992 .

[23]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[24]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Affective Goal and Task Selection for Social Robots , 2009 .

[25]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[26]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[27]  T. Tsuji,et al.  Development of the Face Robot SAYA for Rich Facial Expressions , 2006, 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.

[28]  P. Flandorfer.  Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance , 2012 .

[29]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Development of an Android Robot for Studying Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, IEA/AIE.

[30]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Concepts for dynamic obstacle avoidance and their extended application in underground navigation , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[31]  D. Feil-Seifer,et al.  Defining socially assistive robotics , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[32]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[33]  Sofia Reppou,et al.  Social Inclusion with Robots: A RAPP Case Study Using NAO for Technology Illiterate Elderly at Ormylia Foundation , 2015, Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques.

[34]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of Relational Agents for Health Counseling , 2010 .

[36]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Cross-cultural study on human-robot greeting interaction: acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese , 2013, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.