Sociocultural evolutionism: An untried theory†

The author argues that sociocultural evolutionism has never been an evolutionary theory in the sense in which that model is employed in the life sciences, but that instead it sought natural sequential laws of history or employed an analogy with a developing organism rather than with phylogenetic change. Biology, on the other hand, in embracing polythetic or cluster as opposed to Aristotelian classification, implicitly abandoned this approach only to recover it in theoretical population genetics. Biology today remains a bifurcated science with lawful change occurring within gene pools and abrupt historically specific transitions occurring between them. It is argued that this example holds many lessons for the social sciences and that a truly evolutionary model contains solutions to the diffusionist, Boasian, functionalist and conflict critiques of classical sociocultural evolutionism. Some of the kinds of evidence which would be relevant for the verification of such a theory are discussed and it is concluded that biology may be important for the social sciences not because of the reductionist hopes of sociobiology proper but because of the example it provides in how to describe and theorize about an historical process.

[1]  A. Perelson,et al.  Mathematical models for the evolution of multigene families by unequal crossing over , 1977, Nature.

[2]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[3]  R. Hill,et al.  Family Development in Three Generations , 1973 .

[4]  Jack Goody,et al.  The developmental cycle in domestic groups , 1958 .

[5]  E. Wilson Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1976 .

[6]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[7]  Edward I. Altman,et al.  Corporate bankruptcy in America , 1971 .

[8]  M. L. Samuels Linguistic Evolution: Contents , 1972 .

[9]  L. White,et al.  The Evolution of Culture , 1999 .

[10]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  Principles of Animal Taxonomy , 1961 .

[11]  D. Brown,et al.  The isolation of genes. , 1973, Scientific American.

[12]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Professional Standing and the Reception of Scientific Discoveries , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[14]  L. Hood,et al.  The organization, expression, and evolution of antibody genes and other multigene families. , 1975, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Book Reviews : SOCIETIES : EVOLUTIONARY AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES. By Talcott Parsons. London: Prentice Hall, 1967. Pp. 120. Price 12s. 6d , 1968 .

[16]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. , 1976, Science.

[17]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  Principles of systematic zoology , 1969 .

[18]  Mayr,et al.  Evolution and the diversity of life , 1942 .

[19]  M. L. Samuels Linguistic Evolution by M. L. Samuels , 1972 .

[20]  E. Mayr,et al.  The biological meaning of species , 1969 .

[21]  A. Lovejoy,et al.  The Great Chain of Being , 1963 .

[22]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[23]  D. Carroll,et al.  Adjacent repeating units of xenopus laevis 5S DNA can be heterogeneous in length , 1976, Cell.

[24]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Stratification in American Science , 1970 .

[25]  Roy Wood Sellars,et al.  The science of culture , 1949 .

[26]  M. Harris,et al.  The Rise Of Anthropological Theory , 1968 .

[27]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  The Meaning of Evolution , 1928, Science.

[28]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[29]  Julian Huxley,et al.  The new systematics , 1941 .