Evaluation of computer based laboratory simulation

Abstract A significant number of HND/BSc engineering students work offshore. This results in their missing blocks of the course. Measures to assist them are being developed but an alternative to laboratory experimentation is problematic. Multi-media packages which include a computer-based simulation (CBS) are being developed. One of these has been piloted with full time students. Among the aspects evaluated was the degree to which the desired learning outcomes had been achieved. It was found that the gain in technical knowledge as gauged from assessments and the students' own perception was at least as good with the simulation as with the lab. Paradoxically the students rated their gain in practical ability highly but were rather disparaging in verbal comments about the CBS. Both groups rated their gain in understanding of the relationship between theory and practice highly. The objective of evaluation was to develop and enhance the package. The relevant literature was also surveyed and the paper includes pointers gained from that source. It was concluded that the approach, while not the equivalent of labs in all respects, is the optimum which can be produced. Its success, however, was dependent on the combination of text-based, video and computer components in the package.

[1]  B. Gerard Doornekamp,et al.  Students valuation of the use of computers in education , 1993 .

[2]  Maureen A. Blackmore,et al.  Evaluation of Hypermedia-based learning materials in the teaching of introductory cell biology , 1993 .

[3]  Elizabeth H. Hegarty,et al.  Levels of scientific enquiry in university science laboratory classes: Implications for curriculum deliberations , 1978 .

[4]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Computers and Learning , 1994 .

[5]  John F. Feldhusen,et al.  A rationale for the changes in division 15 convention program: Report of the ad hoc committee on convention format and division communications , 1969 .

[6]  Alan W. Brown,et al.  Processes to support the use of information technology to enhance learning , 1994 .

[7]  Colin White.  Microwave workshop for windows , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[8]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Simulation models for educational purposes: an example on the coexistence of plant populations , 1990 .

[9]  John Whiting,et al.  An Evaluation of Some Common CAL and CBT Authoring Styles , 1989 .

[10]  T. Phillips,et al.  Can CAL biology packages be used to replace the teacher , 1993 .

[11]  Gordon Ritchie,et al.  Enhancing laboratory activity with computer-based tutorials , 1995 .

[12]  John Daniel.  Higher education 1998 transformed by learning technology: Edited by Joyce Martin, Jonathan Darby and Bengt Kjöllerström. CTISS, Oxford. 1994. 95 pp. ISBN 0-9513896-6-1 paperback. £8.00 , 1994 .

[13]  David Boud,et al.  Teaching in Laboratories , 1986 .

[14]  A. Alberto Silva.  Energy in electrical circuits: a computer assisted approach , 1995 .

[15]  Steve Draper,et al.  Simulation software in a life sciences practical laboratory , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Lesley Allinson,et al.  Learning Styles and Computer-Based Learning Environments , 1992, ICCAL.

[17]  Rod Moyse.  Multiple viewpoints imply knowledge negotiation , 1991 .

[18]  D. Y. Northam.  Introducing computer tools into a first course in electrical engineering , 1995 .