Determinants of participation in an Inuit online community of practice

An online community of practice (OCoP) is an important tool for managing and disseminating knowledge within a community. Unfortunately, research shows that OCoPs are often unsuccessful due to lack of participation by members of the community. This paper describes a preliminary investigation of the determinants that impact participation in an OCoP within an Inuit community. An open-ended interview questionnaire was developed and members of the Inuit community were interviewed. Our results show lack of time as the main barrier to participation. Our study also reveals an interest by many members of the Inuit community in being involved in the development of the OCoP. The Inuit have a strong culture built on knowledge sharing, and this allows for open conversations and greater trust within the community. In a culture built and sustained by knowledge sharing, we strongly believe that an OCoP can be a valuable tool, provided the right steps are taken to facilitate and encourage participation.

[1]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  Model Formulation: An Interdisciplinary Computer-based Information Tool for Palliative Severe Pain Management , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  The emerging discourse of knowledge management: a new dawn for information science research? , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Michael Henderson.  Sustaining online teacher professional development through community design , 2007 .

[4]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Asynchronous communication among clinical researchers: A study for systems design , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  E. Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Communities of Practice , 1991 .

[7]  Patricia Milne,et al.  ActKM: the story of a community , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Line Dubé,et al.  The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice , 2005 .

[9]  A. Smith,et al.  Involving users in the design of a system for sharing lessons from adverse incidents in anaesthesia , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[11]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[12]  N. Carr,et al.  Teacher professional learning in an online community: the experiences of the National Quality Schooling Framework Pilot Project , 2006 .

[13]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[14]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  Merrilyn Goos,et al.  Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: Emergence of an online community of practice , 2008 .

[16]  Aimée Hoeve,et al.  Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning , 2006 .

[17]  N. Hara,et al.  Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing , 2007 .

[18]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Dualities, distributed communities of practice and knowledge management , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  User role and perception of requirements in a web-based community of practice , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  Joon Koh,et al.  Encouraging participation in virtual communities , 2007, CACM.

[21]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of practice in the distributed international environment , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[22]  Fiona Brooks,et al.  Exploring knowledge work and leadership in online midwifery communication. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[23]  S. Gearheard.  Using interactive multimedia to document and communicate Inuit knowledge , 2006 .

[24]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Annual Review of Information Science and Technology , 2006, J. Documentation.

[25]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[26]  Elsa Fontainha,et al.  Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, Barriers and Success Factors , 2007 .

[27]  E. Murphy,et al.  Technology‐enhanced learning: An Irish industry perspective , 2005 .

[28]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[29]  Eun-Ok Baek,et al.  How to Build a Better Online Community. , 2008 .

[30]  Philip Uys,et al.  Identifying success factors of ICT in developing a learning community , 2007 .

[31]  Wei Li,et al.  Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of Practice: Going Virtual , 2001, ArXiv.

[33]  Ana Cristina Vasconcelos,et al.  Community and virtual community , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Bette Gray.  Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. , 2004 .