Starburst: a new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others’ posts in online discussions

Online discussions offer exciting potential for educational dialogue, but too often result in disjointed conversations with low levels of interactivity. One contributing cause is the traditional text-based interface, which presents posts in a long list, leaving students overwhelmed and without useful navigational cues. To address this problem, we used information visualization techniques to design a graphical discussion forum interface. Starburst presents discussion posts as a dynamic hyperbolic tree: higher-level posts initially appear as larger and more central nodes, with each level of replies appearing smaller and more towards the periphery. To evaluate the new interface, students’ discussion participation using Starburst was compared to their activity interacting with the same discussion content in a traditional text-based linear forum. Results showed that students were more purposeful in selecting which discussion threads to read when using Starburst and read new posts in a more connected fashion. Implications for the future design, use, and research of online discussions are considered.

[1]  Jim Hewitt.  How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[2]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[3]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space , 1994, UIST '94.

[4]  Jim Hewitt.  Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2005 .

[5]  Carl James Forde,et al.  A virtual margin for knowledge work on the Web: Design, implementation and usability testing , 2008 .

[6]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  G. Stahl.  Building Collaborative Knowing , 2006 .

[8]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree-maps: a space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures , 1991, Proceeding Visualization '91.

[10]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  SpaceTree: supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..

[11]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Knowledge Forum: altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge , 2002 .

[12]  Karen Kear,et al.  Following the thread in computer conferences , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[13]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Asynchronous online discussion thread development: examining growth patterns and peer-facilitation techniques , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  Harnessing Preattentive Perceptual Processes in Visualization , 1995, Perceptual Issues in Visualization.

[16]  Ramana Rao,et al.  The Hyperbolic Browser: A Focus + Context Technique for Visualizing Large Hierarchies , 1996, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[17]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Information visualization using 3D interactive animation , 1993, CACM.

[18]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[19]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Initial Validation of Listening Behavior Typologies for Online Discussions Using Microanalytic Case Studies , 2012, ICLS.

[20]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education , 2004 .

[21]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Beomjin Kim,et al.  Graphical Interface for Visual Exploration of Online Discussion Forums , 2006 .

[23]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[24]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Learning Analytics for Online Discussions: Embedded and Extracted Approaches , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..

[25]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Stuart R. Palmer,et al.  Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? , 2008 .

[28]  Marc A. Smith,et al.  Visualization components for persistent conversations , 2001, CHI.

[29]  Nasser Mansour,et al.  Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Robert Spence,et al.  Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition) , 2006 .

[32]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier , 1994 .

[33]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Alison A. Carr-Chellman,et al.  The Ideal Online Course , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[35]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Using treemaps to visualize threaded discussion forums on PDAs , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[36]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. , 2011 .

[37]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[38]  Luca Weisz,et al.  Quick And Dirty , 2016 .

[39]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Identifying Content-Related Threads in MOOC Discussion Forums , 2015, L@S.

[40]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[41]  Jim Hewitt,et al.  An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Todd Botto,et al.  Integrating Web-Based Technology to Assist and Enhance Instruction, Assessment,and Application of Problem-Based Learning for Manual Therapy Techniques Used in Athletic Training and Sports Medicine , 2006 .

[43]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[44]  Christopher Teplovs,et al.  Tools for concurrent, embedded, and transformative assessment of knowledge building processes and progress , 2007, CSCL.

[45]  A. Wise,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Social Presence on Student Satisfaction, Engagement, and Learning , 2004, ICLS.

[46]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[47]  Farshid Marbouti.  Design, implementation and testing of a visual discussion forum to address new post bias , 2012 .

[48]  António Moreira,et al.  Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[50]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  A Survey of Factors Contributing to Learners' “Listening” Behaviors in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2012 .

[51]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[52]  A. Wise,et al.  Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors , 2013 .

[53]  Yuen-Yan Chan,et al.  Students' views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[54]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Blending In The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States , 2007 .