论文信息 - Stigma Assessment: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Stigma Assessment: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Abstract Stigma of contaminated land is caused by risk perception and has an uncertain nature. It is proposed to assess stigma impacts using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. In this regard, a model is constructed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The case study shows that the MCDM approach has provided a logical and structured framework to process relevant criteria and it is feasible to apply this method to assess the required stigma adjustment factor.

Nelson Chan | Nelson D. Chan

[1] T. Saaty,et al. The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[2] Julian Diaz,et al. An Investigation into the Impact of Previous Expert Value Estimates on Appraisal Judgment , 1997 .

[3] S. Bond. The Use of Conjoint Analysis to Assess the Impact of Environmental Stigma , 2001 .

[4] Thomas L. Saaty,et al. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[5] Thomas L. Saaty,et al. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[6] A. Lavers,et al. Property valuation variation and the 'margin of error' in the UK , 1998 .

[7] Martin Hoesli,et al. Environmental quality perceptions of urban commercial real estate , 1999 .

[8] T. Saaty. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[9] V. Srinivasan,et al. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in house selection , 1994 .

[10] Thomas L. Saaty,et al. The hierarchon : a dictionary of hierarchies , 1996 .

[11] Marvin L. Wolverton,et al. Price‐knowledge‐induced bias: a cross‐cultural comparison , 1997 .

[12] Martin Hoesli,et al. An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Environmental Quality of Housing in Geneva , 1997 .