Opportunities and Challenges of Bodily Interaction for Geometry Learning to Inform Technology Design

An increasing body of work provides evidence of the importance of bodily experience for cognition and the learning of mathematics. Sensor-based technologies have potential for guiding sensori-motor engagement with challenging mathematical ideas in new ways. Yet, designing environments that promote an appropriate sensori-motoric interaction that effectively supports salient foundations of mathematical concepts is challenging and requires understanding of opportunities and challenges that bodily interaction offers. This study aimed to better understand how young children can, and do, use their bodies to explore geometrical concepts of angle and shape, and what contribution the different sensori-motor experiences make to the comprehension of mathematical ideas. Twenty-nine students aged 6–10 years participated in an exploratory study, with paired and group activities designed to elicit intuitive bodily enactment of angles and shape. Our analysis, focusing on moment-by-moment bodily interactions, attended to gesture, action, facial expression, body posture and talk, illustrated the ‘realms of possibilities’ of bodily interaction, and highlighted challenges around ‘felt’ experience and egocentric vs. allocentric perception of the body during collaborative bodily enactment. These findings inform digital designs for sensory interaction to foreground salient geometric features and effectively support relevant forms of enactment to enhance the learning experience, supporting challenging aspects of interaction and exploiting the opportunities of the body.

[1]  S. Price.  Digital Museum Installations: The Role of the Body in Creativity , 2017 .

[2]  J. Hindmarch.  Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life , 2012, QMiP Bulletin.

[3]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Susan M. Wagner,et al.  Explaining Math: Gesturing Lightens the Load , 2001, Psychological science.

[5]  Rogers Hall,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Modalities of Body Engagement in Mathematical Activity and Learning , 2012 .

[6]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[7]  Jennifer S. Thom,et al.  Knowing, Insight Learning, and the Integrity of Kinetic Movement , 2011 .

[8]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[9]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[10]  Thomas Ryberg,et al.  “This is the size of one meter”: Children’s bodily-material collaboration , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  Jacob Davidsen,et al.  Researchers and teachers learning together and from each other using video-based multimodal analysis , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[13]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The use of a digital dance mat for training kindergarten children in a magnitude comparison task , 2010, ICLS.

[14]  Sara Bernardini,et al.  ECHOES: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Mijung Kim,et al.  CHILDREN’S GESTURES AND THE EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE OF GEOMETRY , 2011 .

[16]  A. Gagatsis,et al.  The role of gestures in making connections between space and shape aspects and their verbal representations in the early years: findings from a case study , 2014 .

[17]  Shuai Wang,et al.  Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Barbara King,et al.  Learning angles through movement: Critical actions for developing understanding in an embodied activity , 2014 .

[19]  Caro Williams-Pierce.  Being Mathematical Relations: Dynamic Gestures Support Mathematical Reasoning , 2014 .

[20]  Ella Shoval,et al.  Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles , 2011 .

[21]  Mina Johnson-Glenberg,et al.  Emboldened by Embodiment , 2013 .

[22]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  When the Classroom Floor Becomes the Complex Plane: Addition and Multiplication as Ways of Bodily Navigation , 2012 .

[23]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners' and Teachers' Gestures , 2012 .

[24]  Mark Paterson,et al.  The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies , 2007 .

[25]  Claudia Núñez-Pacheco,et al.  Expanding our perceptual world through technology: a subjective bodily perspective , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[26]  Hennie Brugman,et al.  Annotating Multi-media/Multi-modal Resources with ELAN , 2004, LREC.

[27]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Keith Jones,et al.  Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report , 2016 .

[29]  Carey Jewitt.  Researching the digital : a multimodal approach , 2015 .

[30]  Sara Price,et al.  Embodied experiences of place: a study of history learning with mobile technologies , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Jasmine Y. Ma.  Multi-Party, Whole-Body Interactions in Mathematical Activity , 2017 .

[32]  Keith Jones,et al.  Research on the Teaching and Learning of Geometry , 2016 .

[33]  Michelle Perry,et al.  How many do you see? The use of nonspoken representations in first-grade mathematics lessons , 2001 .

[34]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Geometry and spatial reasoning. , 1992 .

[35]  Monica Gori,et al.  Developing a pedagogical framework for designing a multisensory serious gaming environment , 2017, MIE@ICMI.

[36]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  Toward an embodied-interaction design framework for mathematical concepts , 2011, IDC.

[37]  Patrick G. T. Healey,et al.  Spatial Co-ordination in Music Tuition , 2012, CogSci.

[38]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning , 2016, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.