Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing

Determining which factors promote or impede the sharing of knowledge within groups and organizations constitutes an important area of research. This paper focuses on three such influences: “organizational commitment,” “organizational communication,” and the use of a specific instrument of communication – computer‐mediated communication (CMC). Two processes of knowledge sharing are distinguished: donating and collecting. A number of hypotheses are presented concerning the influence of commitment, climate and CMC on these processes. These hypotheses were tested in six case studies. The results suggest that commitment to the organization positively influences knowledge donating, and is in turn positively influenced by CMC use. Communication climate is found to be a key variable: a constructive communication climate was found to positively influence knowledge donating, knowledge collecting and affective commitment. Finally, a relationship was found that was not hypothesized: knowledge collecting influences knowledge donating in a positive sense – the more knowledge a person collects, the more he or she is willing to also donate knowledge to others. Based on these results, a number of theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and suggestions for further research are presented.

[1]  D. de Wit,et al.  De januskop van kennismanagement , 2000 .

[2]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[3]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratification Niches of Personal E-mail and the Telephone , 2000, Commun. Res..

[4]  Nancy Foy,et al.  Empowering people at work , 1994 .

[5]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[7]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[8]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[9]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[10]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Donald Hislop,et al.  Managing Knowledge and the Problem of Commitment , 2002 .

[12]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[13]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[14]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[15]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[16]  R. Guzley.  Organizational Climate and Communication Climate , 1992 .

[17]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Communication and Commitment in Organizations: A Social Identity Approach , 2001 .

[18]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[19]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[20]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[22]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[23]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[24]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[25]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[26]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[28]  Sandra Moffett,et al.  An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  Richard M. Steers.  Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. , 1977, Administrative science quarterly.

[30]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[31]  Svein Larsen,et al.  Supportive and Defensive Communication , 1993 .

[32]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[33]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government , 1989 .

[34]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[35]  Glenn E. Mangurian,et al.  The changing value of communications technology , 1990 .

[36]  M. Jelinek.  Managing change for competitive success , 1993 .

[37]  H. Scarbrough.  Knowledge as Work: Conflicts in the Management of Knowledge Workers , 1999 .

[38]  Michael C. White,et al.  Satisfaction in Communication: An Examination of the Downs-Hazen Measure , 1981 .

[39]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[40]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[41]  M. Huysman,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Practice , 2002, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[42]  Celia Zárraga,et al.  Factors favoring knowledge management in work teams , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in computer-mediated groups , 1997 .

[44]  Mathieu Weggeman.  Kennismanagement : de praktijk , 2000 .

[45]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Individual and group goals. , 1987 .

[46]  Athanasia Pouloudi,et al.  Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management: hard, soft and abstract issues , 2002 .

[47]  Harry S. Dennis,et al.  A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MANAGERIAL COMMUNICATION CLIMATE IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS. , 1974 .

[48]  THE FRAMEWORK SERIES: , 2022 .

[49]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[50]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AS A PREDICTOR OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT , 1983 .

[51]  Leoni Warne,et al.  Interactions of organizational culture and collaboration in working and learning , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[52]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application , 1997 .

[53]  Thomas J. Page,et al.  Causal modelling in nonexperimental research : an introduction to the LISREL approach , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[54]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[55]  Jan A. de Ridder,et al.  Knowing What to Manage The development and application of a knowledge management scan , 2002 .

[56]  R. Kanter.  COMMITMENT AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: A STUDY OF COMMITMENT MECHANISMS IN UTOPIAN COMMUNITIES * , 1968 .