Structural performance of semi-rigid composite frame under column loss

The catenary action associated with significant second order effects plays an important role in resisting additional loads when structural column is destroyed under unexpected loads. The capacity and ductility of beam-to-column connection is one of the key factors in the formation and performance of catenary action. To study the behavior of the semi-rigid connection under single column removal scenario, a pseudo-static test of a composite frame with flush-endplate connections (a typical semi-rigid composite connection type) under the loss of middle column was carried out. Also, a FE model using both 3-D elements and 2-D elements was developed and analyzed. The accuracy of FE analysis results is validated by comparing with the experimental results. The analytical results showed that the progressive collapse resistance is sensitive to the properties of bolts. It is also found that increasing the fracture strain of bolts, the progressive collapse resistance of composite frame improves significantly, and increasing the diameter of bolts shank could also increase the loading-capacity and ductility of the connection. Meanwhile, some measures are suggested to improve the behavior of connection in resisting progressive collapse. Among them, a new technique called angle-steel reinforcement method is developed and proved to be a good way to improve the progressive resistance of semi-rigid composite frame.

[1]  Shalva Marjanishvili,et al.  SDOF Model for Progressive Collapse Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  Meng-Hao Tsai,et al.  Investigation of progressive collapse resistance and inelastic response for an earthquake-resistant RC building subjected to column failure , 2008 .

[3]  Xiao Yan,et al.  Collapse performance of RC frame structure , 2007 .

[4]  N. E. Shanmugam,et al.  Testing of steel-concrete composite connections and appraisal of results , 2000 .

[5]  L. Ye,et al.  An improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete frame structures , 2011 .

[6]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Experimental tests of different types of bolted steel beam–column joints under a central-column-removal scenario , 2013 .

[7]  Robert G. Driver,et al.  Performance of Steel Shear Connections under Combined Moment, Shear, and Tension , 2012 .

[8]  Jean-Pierre Jaspart,et al.  Experimental test simulating a column loss in a composite frame , 2010 .

[9]  K. F. Chung,et al.  Composite column design to Eurocode 4 : based on DD ENV 1994-1-1: 1994 Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings , 1994 .

[10]  Yong Lu,et al.  Experimental investigation of beam-to-tubular column moment connections under column removal scenario , 2013 .

[11]  Feng Fu,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method , 2009 .

[12]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Collapse Behavior of Steel Special Moment Resisting Frame Connections , 2007 .

[13]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part II: Application , 2008 .

[14]  David M. Anderson,et al.  Performance of composite connections: Major axis end plate joints , 1994 .

[15]  Roberto T. Leon Semi-rigid composite construction , 1988 .

[16]  Bo Yang,et al.  Numerical analyses of steel beam-column joints subjected to catenary action , 2012 .

[17]  Uwe Starossek,et al.  Typology of progressive collapse , 2007 .

[18]  Shan Gao,et al.  Experimental study and numerical analysis of progressive collapse resistance of composite frames , 2013 .