Managing Innovation Champions: The Impact of Project Characteristics on the Direct Manager Role*

A key challenge for organizations seeking to improve the management of innovation lies in determining when to lend direct managerial support, and how much support, to those championing such projects. This research provides insights into the connection between project characteristics and the type and frequency of direct manager involvement. As such, it addresses the following research question: how does the level of project innovativeness, strategic relatedness, and resource requirements impact the level of empowerment of innovation champions and the sponsor or supervisor role played by managers? The research method involves a survey of 89 project champions from four divisions of large, multinational Korean companies. The results show that when innovativeness was high but projects were strategically related, there was greater project champion empowerment but also a more frequent managerial sponsor role. This suggests it may be best to allow innovators, who are close to the project's markets, technologies, and industry conditions, to have greater freedom over objectives and decisions. Yet they may also need the advice and support of their managers to function optimally under the highly uncertain conditions that characterize innovative projects. This combination of empowerment and a sponsor role, though appropriate for highly innovative projects, may also require high strategic relatedness, however. On the other hand, when projects are less strategically related and when resource requirements are high, the analysis suggests managers are more likely to exert control. Managers may therefore need to become more closely involved in decision making for costly ventures representing new strategic directions for their organizations. Overall, this research suggests that both empowerment and manager roles are relevant to the management of innovation. These results offer academic value in recognizing the nature of the direct manager role under different innovation project conditions. It further reveals a need for academics to recognize both the supervisor and sponsor roles in the management of innovation. For managers, the findings suggest that for organizations to effectively develop and commercialize innovations managers need to recognize when certain projects call for different levels and types of involvement.

[1]  D. Sull,et al.  Why good companies go bad. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[2]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Special Topic: Democracy in and Around Organizations Is organizational democracy worth the effort? , 2004 .

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  Middle Management’s Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[5]  David H. Gobeli,et al.  Analyzing Product Innovations , 1987 .

[6]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Cultures that support product-innovation processes , 2002 .

[7]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Effects of Champion Behavior, Team Potency, and External Communication Activities on Predicting Team Performance , 2006 .

[8]  Hollister B. Sykes,et al.  Corporate venturing obstacles: Sources and solutions , 1989 .

[9]  G. Hofstede THE INTERACTION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL VALUE SYSTEMS[1] , 1985 .

[10]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[11]  Mushin Lee,et al.  Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered , 1994 .

[12]  D. Kelley Adaptation and organizational connectedness in corporate radical innovation programs , 2009 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[14]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[15]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[16]  George S. Day,et al.  Avoiding the Pitfalls of Emerging Technologies , 2000 .

[17]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[18]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The breakfast of champions: associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance , 1998 .

[19]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[20]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[22]  R. Ireland,et al.  A Model of Middle–Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior , 2005 .

[23]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  Problems remain, but theories will change: The universal and the specific in 21st-century global management , 1999 .

[24]  Russell M. Knight,et al.  Corporate Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Canadian Study , 1987 .

[25]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[26]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[27]  Rita Gunther McGrath Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[28]  Patricia W. Meyers,et al.  Defining roles for logistics during routine and radical technological innovation , 1989 .

[29]  S. Markham Corporate Championing and Antagonism as Forms of Political Behavior: An R&D Perspective , 2000 .

[30]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[31]  Diana L. Day Raising Radicals: Different Processes for Championing Innovative Corporate Ventures , 1994 .

[32]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[33]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Swimming in Newstreams: Mastering Innovation Dilemmas , 1989 .

[34]  S. Zahra,et al.  Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale , 2002 .

[35]  S. Shane,et al.  Cultural Differences in Innovation Championing Strategies , 1995 .

[36]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[37]  Herman Stekler,et al.  Introducing technologically advanced products: Strategies in the commercial aircraft industry , 1995 .

[38]  Christopher K. Bart,et al.  General managers control new and existing products differently , 1993 .

[39]  Scott Shane,et al.  Are champions different from non-champions? , 1994 .

[40]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[41]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior , 2005 .

[42]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[43]  Robert D. Russell,et al.  Developing a Process Model of Intrapreneurial Systems: A Cognitive Mapping Approach , 1999 .

[44]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[45]  B. Zirger,et al.  A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test , 1990 .

[46]  Raghu Garud,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Internal Corporate Venturing Process , 1992 .

[47]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[48]  B. Zirger,et al.  The new product learning cycle , 1985 .

[49]  Stephen K. Markham,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of How Champions Influence Others to Support Their Projects , 1998 .

[50]  D. Smith,et al.  The politics of innovation: why innovations need a godfather , 2007 .

[51]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[52]  Deborah V. Brazeal Organizing for internally developed corporate ventures , 1993 .

[53]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[54]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[55]  Jane M. Howell The right stuff: Identifying and developing effective champions of innovation , 2005 .

[56]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[57]  Lionel Roure,et al.  Product Champion Characteristics in France and Germany , 2001 .