Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?

[1]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology , 2016, Research synthesis methods.

[2]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Trustworthy guidelines – excellent; customized care tools – even better , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[4]  Mohammad Hassan Murad,et al.  Development of a novel, multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines. , 2015, Chest.

[5]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Mohammad Hassan Murad,et al.  A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Tari Turner,et al.  Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[9]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines 15: going from evidence to recommendation - determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength]. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[10]  Published Online.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014 .

[11]  Thomas Agoritsas,et al.  Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. , 2013, Chest.

[12]  Sarah E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results , 2013, Implementation Science.

[13]  Daniel Pérez,et al.  Epistemonikos: A Free, Relational, Collaborative, Multilingual Database of Health Evidence , 2013, MedInfo.

[14]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[15]  Christine Laine,et al.  Trustworthy Clinical Guidelines , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[18]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Going from evidence to recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GrADe : what is “ quality of evidence ” and why is it important to clinicians ? rATING quALITY of evIDeNCe AND STreNGTH of reCommeNDATIoNS , 2022 .

[21]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  G. Lu,et al.  Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  Rebecca S. Graves,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. , 2002 .

[24]  D. Sackett,et al.  Cochrane Collaboration , 1994, BMJ.