InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes

Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSAR) is biased downward. For infinitely deep uniform volumes, the elevation bias is often equated with the penetration depth, but in this paper, it is shown that the two quantities generally differ. The interferometric bias is approximately equal to the two-way power-penetration depth if the latter is small compared to the ambiguity height, but for increasing penetration depth, the bias approaches one quarter of the ambiguity height. Consequently, no phase wrapping results even if the penetration depth exceeds the ambiguity height. The ratio of the InSAR elevation bias to the ambiguity height depends only on the ratio of the penetration depth to the ambiguity height, and the bias can be expressed in terms of the InSAR coherence magnitude, which makes it possible to correct the InSAR surface elevation for the bias. The volume depth can be considered infinite if it exceeds the penetration depth by a factor of two to five and if the surface scattering from the top and the bottom of the volume is negligible.

[1]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  The wavenumber shift in SAR interferometry , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  M. Moghaddam,et al.  Vegetation characteristics and underlying topography from interferometric radar , 1996 .

[3]  Konstantinos Papathanassiou,et al.  Single-baseline polarimetric SAR interferometry , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  R. Treuhaft,et al.  Vertical structure of vegetated land surfaces from interferometric and polarimetric radar , 2000 .

[5]  E. Weber Hoen,et al.  Penetration depths inferred from interferometric volume decorrelation observed over the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  S. Madsen,et al.  Topography and penetration of the Greenland Ice Sheet measured with Airborne SAR Interferometry , 2001 .

[7]  Kevin K. Williams,et al.  Radar attenuation by sand: laboratory measurements of radar transmission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Iain H. Woodhouse,et al.  Forest height retrieval from commercial X-band SAR products , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Fuk K. Li,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar interferometry , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Chris Varekamp,et al.  High-resolution InSAR image simulation for forest canopies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  G. Schaber,et al.  Subsurface Valleys and Geoarcheology of the Eastern Sahara Revealed by Shuttle Radar , 1982, Science.

[12]  Kostas Papathanassiou,et al.  First demonstration of airborne SAR tomography using multibaseline L-band data , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[13]  Alberto Moreira,et al.  First demonstration of airborne SAR tomography using multibaseline L-band data , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  W. Krabill,et al.  Penetration depth of interferometric synthetic‐aperture radar signals in snow and ice , 2001, Geophysical Research Letters.

[15]  Konstantinos P. Papathanassiou,et al.  Polarimetric SAR interferometry , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Maurizio Santoro,et al.  Tree height influence on ERS interferometric phase in boreal forest , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  S. Cloude,et al.  Three-stage inversion process for polarimetric SAR interferometry , 2003 .