Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing.

A new quantitative tissue differentiation theory which relates the local tissue formation in a fracture gap to the local stress and strain is presented. Our hypothesis proposes that the amounts of strain and hydrostatic pressure along existing calcified surfaces in the fracture callus determine the differentiation of the callus tissue. The study compares the local strains and stresses in the callus as calculated from a finite element model with histological findings from an animal fracture model. The hypothesis predicts intramembranous bone formation for strains smaller approximately +/- 5% and hydrostatic pressures smaller than +/- 0.15 MPa. Endochondral ossification is associated with compressive pressures larger than about -0.15 MPa and strains smaller than +/- 15%. All other conditions seemed to lead to connective tissue or fibrous cartilage. The hypothesis enables a better understanding of the complex tissue differentiation seen in histological images and the mechanical conditions for healing delayed healing or nonunions.

[1]  J. Middleton,et al.  Recent advances in computer methods in biomechanics & biomedical engineering , 1992 .

[2]  P Augat,et al.  Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Uhthoff Hk Current concepts of internal fixation of fractures. , 1980 .

[4]  L E Claes,et al.  Osteonal structure better predicts tensile strength of healing bone than volume fraction. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A. Hulth,et al.  Current concepts of fracture healing. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  R. Barmada External Fixation: The Current State of the Art , 1979 .

[7]  L Claes,et al.  Analysis of inter-fragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J Kenwright,et al.  Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  Current concepts of internal fixation of fractures. , 1980, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[10]  S M Perren,et al.  Role of interfragmentary strain in fracture healing: Ovine model of a healing osteotomy , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  J Kenwright,et al.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  D T Davy,et al.  The biomechanical behavior of healing canine radii and ribs. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. E. Goodship,et al.  EFFECT OF CONTROLLED AXIAL MICROMOVEMENT ON HEALING OF TIBIAL FRACTURES , 1986, The Lancet.

[14]  B C Elliott,et al.  Disc degeneration and the young fast bowler in cricket. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  D. Baksi Fracture healing. , 1980, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[16]  N. Takahashi,et al.  Effect of a continuously applied compressive pressure on mouse osteoblast‐like cells (MC3T3‐E1) in vitro , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[17]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Role of mechanical loading in the progressive ossification of a fracture callus , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[19]  L. Hench,et al.  Perspectives on biomaterials , 1999 .

[20]  R Huiskes,et al.  From structure to process, from organ to cell: recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  A. M. Digioia,et al.  Three-dimensional strain fields in a uniform osteotomy gap. , 1986 .

[22]  D E Ashhurst,et al.  The influence of mechanical conditions on the healing of experimental fractures in the rabbit: a microscopical study. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  Brighton Ct The biology of fracture repair. , 1984 .

[24]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Enhancement of fracture-healing. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  H. Frost,et al.  The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  L. Claes,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Experimental Fracture Repair by Peripheral Computed Tomography , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[28]  C. Brighton The biology of fracture repair. , 1984, Instructional course lectures.

[29]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The Scientific Basis of Orthopaedics , 1979 .

[30]  B. Mckibbin,et al.  The biology of fracture healing in long bones. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  Friedrich Pauwels Eine neue Theorie über den Einfluß mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Stützgewebe , 1965 .

[32]  K. Bathe,et al.  A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis , 1987 .

[33]  H Willenegger,et al.  [Primary and secondary healing of bone fractures]. , 1971, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[34]  D J Simmons,et al.  Fracture Healing Perspectives , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.