Defining Patient Complexity From the Primary Care Physician's Perspective

BACKGROUND Patients with complex health needs are increasingly the focus of health system redesign. OBJECTIVE To characterize complex patients, as defined by their primary care physicians (PCPs), and to compare this definition with other commonly used algorithms. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING 1 hospital-based practice, 4 community health centers, and 7 private practices in a primary care network in the United States. PARTICIPANTS 40 physicians who reviewed a random sample of 120 of their own patients. MEASUREMENTS After excluding patients for whom they were not directly responsible, PCPs indicated which of their patients they considered complex. These patients were characterized, independent predictors of complexity were identified, and PCP-defined complexity was compared with 3 comorbidity-based methods (Charlson score, Higashi score, and a proprietary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services algorithm). RESULTS Physicians identified 1126 of their 4302 eligible patients (26.2%) as complex and assigned a mean of 2.2 domains of complexity per patient (median, 2.0 [interquartile range, 1 to 3]). Mental health and substance use were identified as major issues in younger complex patients, whereas medical decision making and care coordination predominated in older patients (P<0.001 for trends by decade). Major independent predictors of PCP-defined complexity (P<0.001) included age (probability of complexity increased from 14.8% to 19.8% with age increasing from 55 to 65 years), poorly controlled diabetes (from 12.7% to 47.6% if hemoglobin A1c level≥9%), use of antipsychotics (from 12.7% to 31.8%), alcohol-related diagnoses (from 12.9% to 27.4%), and inadequate insurance (from 12.5% to 19.2%). Classification agreement for complex patients ranged from 26.2% to 56.0% when PCP assignment was compared with each of the other methods. LIMITATION Results may not be generalizable to other primary care settings. CONCLUSION Primary care physicians identified approximately one quarter of their patients as complex. Medical, social, and behavioral factors all contributed to PCP-defined complexity. Physician-defined complexity had only modest agreement with 3 comorbidity-based algorithms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Partners Community Healthcare, Inc.

[1]  J. Knickman,et al.  Changing the chronic care system to meet people's needs. , 2001, Health affairs.

[2]  Sheldon Greenfield,et al.  Measuring Quality of Care in Patients With Multiple Clinical Conditions: Summary of a Conference Conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  Peter Shin,et al.  The states' next challenge--securing primary care for expanded Medicaid populations. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Chueh,et al.  Is this “My’ patient? Development and validation of a predictive model to link patients to primary care providers , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  John D. Piette,et al.  Beyond Comorbidity Counts: How Do Comorbidity Type and Severity Influence Diabetes Patients’ Treatment Priorities and Self-Management? , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  C J Peek,et al.  Primary care for patient complexity, not only disease. , 2009, Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare.

[7]  D. Jeffe,et al.  Primary Care Specialty Choices of United States Medical Graduates, 1997–2006 , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  Hoangmai H Pham,et al.  Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. , 2010, Health affairs.

[9]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Transforming primary care: from past practice to the practice of the future. , 2010, Health affairs.

[12]  Kevin B. Weiss,et al.  Managing Complexity in Chronic Care: An overview of the VA State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Conference , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  Peter de Jonge,et al.  Case and care complexity in the medically ill. , 2006, The Medical clinics of North America.

[14]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  Asaf Bitton,et al.  A Nationwide Survey of Patient Centered Medical Home Demonstration Projects , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Amy K. Rosen,et al.  Applying a Risk-Adjustment Framework to Primary Care: Can We Improve on Existing Measures? , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[17]  M. Parchman,et al.  Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[18]  Gregg Warshaw,et al.  Introduction: Advances and Challenges in Care of Older People with Chronic Illness , 2006 .

[19]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the U.S. health care workforce do the job? , 2009, Health affairs.

[20]  B. Starfield,et al.  Defining Comorbidity: Implications for Understanding Health and Health Services , 2009, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[21]  A. Ash,et al.  Finding future high-cost cases: comparing prior cost versus diagnosis-based methods. , 2001, Health services research.

[22]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Jennifer S. Haas,et al.  Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[24]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.