Single-subject grey matter network trajectories over the disease course of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Structural grey matter covariance networks provide an individual quantification of morphological patterns in the brain. The network integrity is disrupted in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, and network properties show associations with the level of amyloid pathology and cognitive decline. Therefore, these network properties might be disease progression markers. However, it remains unclear when and how grey matter network integrity changes with disease progression. We investigated these questions in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutation carriers, whose conserved age at dementia onset allows individual staging based upon their estimated years to symptom onset. From the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network observational cohort, we selected T1-weighted MRI scans from 269 mutation carriers and 170 non-carriers (mean age 38 ± 15 years, mean estimated years to symptom onset −9 ± 11), of whom 237 had longitudinal scans with a mean follow-up of 3.0 years. Single-subject grey matter networks were extracted, and we calculated for each individual the network properties which describe the network topology, including the size, clustering, path length and small worldness. We determined at which time point mutation carriers and non-carriers diverged for global and regional grey matter network metrics, both cross-sectionally and for rate of change over time. Based on cross-sectional data, the earliest difference was observed in normalized path length, which was decreased for mutation carriers in the precuneus area at 13 years and on a global level 12 years before estimated symptom onset. Based on longitudinal data, we found the earliest difference between groups on a global level 6 years before symptom onset, with a greater rate of decline of network size for mutation carriers. We further compared grey matter network small worldness with established biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (i.e. amyloid accumulation, cortical thickness, brain metabolism and cognitive function). We found that greater amyloid accumulation at baseline was associated with faster decline of small worldness over time, and decline in grey matter network measures over time was accompanied by decline in brain metabolism, cortical thinning and cognitive decline. In summary, network measures decline in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease, which is alike sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, and the properties show decline over time prior to estimated symptom onset. These data suggest that single-subject networks properties obtained from structural MRI scans form an additional non-invasive tool for understanding the substrate of cognitive decline and measuring progression from preclinical to severe clinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease.

[1]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype , 2019, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[2]  A. Fagan,et al.  Staging biomarkers in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease by estimated years to symptom onset , 2019, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[3]  D. Bassett,et al.  Person-Based Brain Morphometric Similarity is Heritable and Correlates With Biological Features , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  A. Fagan,et al.  Incident cognitive impairment: longitudinal changes in molecular, structural and cognitive biomarkers , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Nick C. Fox,et al.  Longitudinal cognitive and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease , 2018, Neurology.

[6]  Yi Su,et al.  Longitudinal brain imaging in preclinical Alzheimer disease: impact of APOE &egr;4 genotype , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Preferential degradation of cognitive networks differentiates Alzheimer’s disease from ageing , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  E. Westman,et al.  Altered structural network organization in cognitively normal individuals with amyloid pathology , 2018, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  C. Jack,et al.  NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease , 2018, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[10]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  A more randomly organized grey matter network is associated with deteriorating language and global cognition in individuals with subjective cognitive decline , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[11]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  Gray Matter Network Disruptions and Regional Amyloid Beta in Cognitively Normal Adults , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[12]  Christoph Laske,et al.  Left frontal hub connectivity delays cognitive impairment in autosomal-dominant and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Andrew J. Saykin,et al.  Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  P. Scheltens,et al.  Gray matter networks and clinical progression in subjects with predementia Alzheimer's disease , 2018, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  P. Scheltens,et al.  Gray matter network measures are associated with cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment , 2018, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Daniel C Alexander,et al.  Data-driven models of dominantly-inherited Alzheimer’s disease progression , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  Peter B. Jones,et al.  Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter-Individual Cognitive Variation , 2017, Neuron.

[18]  D. Marcus,et al.  Presymptomatic atrophy in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: A serial magnetic resonance imaging study , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[19]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[20]  Chengjie Xiong,et al.  The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer's prevention trial: Adaptive design and disease progression model , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[21]  P. Tariot,et al.  EU/US/CTAD Task Force: Lessons Learned from Recent and Current Alzheimer's Prevention Trials. , 2017, The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

[22]  C. E. Han,et al.  Using Individualized Brain Network for Analyzing Structural Covariance of the Cerebral Cortex in Alzheimer's Patients , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  K. Blennow,et al.  Alzheimer's disease , 2016, The Lancet.

[24]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Gray matter network disruptions and amyloid beta in cognitively normal adults , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[25]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[26]  Michael J Leach,et al.  Longitudinal , 2015, The Medical journal of Australia.

[27]  A. Gelman,et al.  Stan , 2015 .

[28]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging , 2015, NeuroImage.

[29]  Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda,et al.  Estimating long-term multivariate progression from short-term data , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[30]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Symptom onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease , 2014, Neurology.

[31]  Nick C Fox,et al.  A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[32]  Andrei G. Vlassenko,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of PiB-PET with FreeSurfer ROIs , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  C. Stam,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: connecting findings from graph theoretical studies of brain networks , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[35]  C. Rowe,et al.  Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[36]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  Single-Subject Grey Matter Graphs in Alzheimer's Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The Convergence of Maturational Change and Structural Covariance in Human Cortical Networks , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  FreeSurfer , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. Willshaw,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr221 Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published September 21, 2011 Similarity-Based Extraction of Individual Networks from Gray Matter MRI Scans , 2022 .

[42]  D. Shen,et al.  Discriminant analysis of longitudinal cortical thickness changes in Alzheimer's disease using dynamic and network features , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[43]  Cindee M. Madison,et al.  Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[44]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  Abnormal Cortical Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  Efstathios D. Gennatas,et al.  Network-level structural covariance in the developing brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[47]  Owen Carmichael,et al.  Update on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[48]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Human brain networks in health and disease , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[49]  B. Miller,et al.  Neurodegenerative Diseases Target Large-Scale Human Brain Networks , 2009, Neuron.

[50]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural Insights into Aberrant Topological Patterns of Large-Scale Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[52]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural Covariance in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Bogdan Draganski,et al.  Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training , 2004, Nature.

[56]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[57]  J. Morris The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) , 1993, Neurology.