The effects of ionizing radiation on commercial power MOSFETs operated at cryogenic temperatures

This is the first report of commercial n- and p-channel power MOSFETs exposed to ionizing radiation while operating in a cryogenic environment. The transistors were exposed to low energy X-rays while placed in a liquid nitrogen-cooled dewar. Results demonstrate significant performance and survivability advantages for space-borne power MOSFETs operated at cryogenic temperatures. The key advantages for low-temperature operation of power MOSFET's in an ionizing radiation environment are: (1) steeper subthreshold current slope before and after irradiation; (2) lower off-state leakage currents before and after irradiation; and (3) larger prerad threshold voltage for n-channel devices. The first two points are also beneficial for devices that are not irradiated, but the advantages are more significant in radiation environments. The third point is only an advantage for commercial devices operated in radiation environments. Results also demonstrate that commercial off-the-shelf power MOSFETs can be used for low-temperature operation in a limited total dose environment (i.e., many space applications). >

[1]  Bruce E. Deal,et al.  Interface states and electron spin resonance centers in thermally oxidized (111) and (100) silicon wafers , 1981 .

[2]  D. Fleetwood,et al.  Effects of oxide traps, interface traps, and ‘‘border traps’’ on metal‐oxide‐semiconductor devices , 1993 .

[3]  David L. Griscom,et al.  Formation of interface traps in MOSFETs during annealing following low temperature irradiation , 1988 .

[4]  H. E. Boesch,et al.  An Electrical Technique to Measure the Radiation Susceptibility of MOS Gate Insulators , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Kenneth F. Galloway,et al.  Separation of effects of oxide-trapped charge and interface-trapped charge on mobility in irradiated power MOSFETs , 1993 .

[6]  Krishna Shenai,et al.  Performance potential of low-voltage power MOSFETs in liquid-nitrogen-cooled power systems , 1991 .

[7]  O. Mueller,et al.  On-resistance, thermal resistance and reverse recovery time of power MOSFETs at 77 K , 1989 .

[8]  P. Winokur,et al.  Simple technique for separating the effects of interface traps and trapped‐oxide charge in metal‐oxide‐semiconductor transistors , 1986 .

[9]  Kenneth F. Galloway,et al.  Dose-rate effects on the total-dose threshold-voltage shift of power MOSFETs , 1988 .

[10]  J Gowar,et al.  Power MOSFETs: Theory and Applications , 1989 .

[11]  Patrick M. Lenahan,et al.  Hole traps and trivalent silicon centers in metal/oxide/silicon devices , 1984 .

[12]  Daniel M. Fleetwood,et al.  Estimating oxide‐trap, interface‐trap, and border‐trap charge densities in metal‐oxide‐semiconductor transistors , 1994 .

[13]  D. Fleetwood.  'Border traps' in MOS devices , 1992 .

[14]  Bantval J. Baliga,et al.  Analysis and optimization of power MOSFETs for cryogenic operation , 1993 .

[15]  N. S. Saks,et al.  Generation of Interface States by Ionizing Radiation at 80K Measured by Charge Pumping and Subthreshold Slope Techniques , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.