Understanding the dependence of the uncertainty in a satellite precipitation data set on the underlying surface and a correction method based on geographically weighted regression

It is widely acknowledged that the complicated underlying surface is one of the prominent reasons leading to serious uncertainty in satellite precipitation data sets over mountainous regions. However, no analysis has been conducted to quantitatively investigate the correlation between the errors in satellite precipitation data sets and the underlying surface. Using 133 monthly rain gauge observations over the Tibetan Plateau, the Bias and the residuals of ordinary least regression (the latter called ‘Ɛ’) in Climate Prediction Center morphing (CMORPH) data were calculated and were fitted with underlying surface factors using the geographically weighted regression (GWR) method, aiming at quantitatively understanding the dependence of the uncertainty in the CMORPH data set on the underlying surface over the Tibetan Plateau. We found that the 39.4% and 50.5% of the variance of the Bias and Ɛ, respectively, could be explained by the digital elevation model, the normalized difference vegetation index and land surface temperature. Furthermore, the explained variance of the Bias and Ɛ could be increased to 53.6% and 75.1%, respectively, by adding the CMORPH to the explanatory variables. Subsequently, the errors in the CMORPH were estimated by the GWR model, which was selected by comparing the explanation strengths of these models, and then the simulated errors were used to correct the precipitation estimated by CMORPH over areas without gauges. Independent validation indicated that the corrected CMORPH showed obviously better performance compared with the uncorrected CMORPH as well as two widely used precipitation estimates – the Universal Kriging interpolation model and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B43. These results reveal the significant influence of the underlying surface on the uncertainty in satellite precipitation data sets over mountainous areas and provide a promising approach to improve the precipitation estimates derived from satellite observations using underlying surface information.

[1]  William R. Cotton,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of Several Factors Contributing to the Observed Variable Intensity of Deep Convection over South Florida , 1980 .

[2]  Norman C. Grody,et al.  Effects of surface conditions on rain identification using the DMSP‐SSM/I , 1994 .

[3]  Yang Hong,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of bias from satellite rainfall estimates using copula method , 2014 .

[4]  T. Stein International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium , 1992, [Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  N. Grody Classification of snow cover and precipitation using the special sensor microwave imager , 1991 .

[6]  Pingping Xie,et al.  A conceptual model for constructing high‐resolution gauge‐satellite merged precipitation analyses , 2011 .

[7]  Yuanjing Zhu,et al.  Remote sensing of precipitation on the Tibetan Plateau using the TRMM Microwave Imager , 2001 .

[8]  Y. Hong,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of satellite precipitation estimation and Monte Carlo assessment of the error propagation into hydrologic response , 2004 .

[9]  Xiaoling Chen,et al.  An Assessment of the Biases of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over the Tibetan Plateau and Correction Methods Based on Topographic Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Understanding the Scale Relationships of Uncertainty Propagation of Satellite Rainfall through a Distributed Hydrologic Model , 2010 .

[11]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Tracing hydrologic model simulation error as a function of satellite rainfall estimation bias components and land use and land cover conditions , 2012 .

[12]  Zheng Du,et al.  The system of physico-geographical regions of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau , 1996 .

[13]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Effect of precipitation sampling error on simulated hydrological fluxes and states: Anticipating the Global Precipitation Measurement satellites , 2004 .

[14]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice , 2012 .

[15]  Thierry Toutin,et al.  Land cover classification using airborne LiDAR products in Beauport, Québec, Canada , 2013 .

[16]  Shaofeng Jia,et al.  A statistical spatial downscaling algorithm of TRMM precipitation based on NDVI and DEM in the Qaidam Basin of China , 2011 .

[17]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Understanding the Dependence of Satellite Rainfall Uncertainty on Topography and Climate for Hydrologic Model Simulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Peter Reinartz,et al.  Matching of high resolution optical data to a shaded DEM , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[19]  Marc F. Müller,et al.  Bias adjustment of satellite rainfall data through stochastic modeling: Methods development and application to Nepal , 2013 .

[20]  G. Foody Geographical weighting as a further refinement to regression modelling: An example focused on the NDVI–rainfall relationship , 2003 .

[21]  F. Turk,et al.  Component analysis of errors in satellite-based precipitation estimates , 2009 .

[22]  S. J. Connor,et al.  Validation of high‐resolution satellite rainfall products over complex terrain , 2008 .

[23]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[24]  Z. Wan New refinements and validation of the MODIS Land-Surface Temperature/Emissivity products , 2008 .

[25]  Tim J. Hewison,et al.  Airborne measurements of forest and agricultural land surface emissivity at millimeter wavelengths , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[26]  Am Mudabeti,et al.  Remote sensing 1 , 2013 .

[27]  J. Chen,et al.  The use of precipitation intensity in estimating gross primary production in four northern grasslands , 2012 .

[28]  Emad Habib,et al.  Accounting for Uncertainties of the TRMM Satellite Estimates , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[29]  E. Anagnostou,et al.  Precipitation: Measurement, remote sensing, climatology and modeling , 2009 .