Finite Element Modeling in the Design Process of 3D Printed Pneumatic Soft Actuators and Sensors

The modeling of soft structures, actuators, and sensors is challenging, primarily due to the high nonlinearities involved in such soft robotic systems. Finite element modeling (FEM) is an effective technique to represent soft and deformable robotic systems containing geometric nonlinearities due to large mechanical deformations, material nonlinearities due to the inherent nonlinear behavior of the materials (i.e., stress-strain behavior) involved in such systems, and contact nonlinearities due to the surfaces that come into contact upon deformation. Prior to the fabrication of such soft robotic systems, FEM can be used to predict their behavior efficiently and accurately under various inputs and optimize their performance and topology to meet certain design and performance requirements. In this article, we present the implementation of FEM in the design process of directly three-dimensional (3D) printed pneumatic soft actuators and sensors to accurately predict their behavior and optimize their performance and topology. We present numerical and experimental results to show that this approach is very effective to rapidly and efficiently design the soft actuators and sensors to meet certain design requirements and to save time, modeling, design, and fabrication resources.

[1]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Untethered soft robotics , 2018 .

[2]  Choon Chiang Foo,et al.  Untethered soft robot capable of stable locomotion using soft electrostatic actuators , 2018 .

[3]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[4]  Suiyang Khoo,et al.  Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators , 2016 .

[5]  Jamie Paik,et al.  Modeling, Design, and Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Finite Element Method   , 2016 .

[6]  Akif Kaynak,et al.  Closed-loop 4D-printed soft robots , 2020 .

[7]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Soft Pneumatic Sensing Chambers for Generic and Interactive Human–Machine Interfaces , 2019, Adv. Intell. Syst..

[8]  Christian Duriez,et al.  SOFA: A Multi-Model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation , 2012 .

[9]  Lakmal Seneviratne,et al.  Discrete Cosserat Approach for Multisection Soft Manipulator Dynamics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[10]  Daniela Rus,et al.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots , 2015, Soft robotics.

[11]  Knopf,et al.  Pneumatic Hyperelastic Actuators for Grasping Curved Organic Objects , 2019, Actuators.

[12]  P. Polygerinos,et al.  Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle , 2015 .

[13]  Gursel Alici,et al.  3D Printable Linear Soft Vacuum Actuators: Their Modeling, Performance Quantification and Application in Soft Robotic Systems , 2019, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[14]  LipsonHod,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of Soft Robots , 2014 .

[15]  Christian Duriez,et al.  Finite Element Method-Based Kinematics and Closed-Loop Control of Soft, Continuum Manipulators. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[16]  D. Floreano,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers , 2018, Advanced materials.

[17]  Fionnuala Connolly,et al.  Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[19]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[20]  C. Majidi Soft‐Matter Engineering for Soft Robotics , 2018, Advanced Materials Technologies.

[21]  Lakmal D. Seneviratne,et al.  Discrete Cosserat Approach for Multi-Section Soft Robots Dynamics , 2017, ArXiv.

[22]  Osman Dogan Yirmibesoglu,et al.  Additive manufacturing of soft robots , 2019, Robotic Systems and Autonomous Platforms.

[23]  G. Alici,et al.  Environmentally friendly and biodegradable ultra-sensitive piezoresistive sensors for wearable electronics applications. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[24]  Jérémie Dequidt,et al.  Visual servoing control of soft robots based on finite element model , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[25]  Barry Trimmer,et al.  Soft robots , 2013, Current Biology.

[26]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Bioinspired 3D Printable Soft Vacuum Actuators for Locomotion Robots, Grippers and Artificial Muscles. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[27]  Soha Hassoun,et al.  Evolving soft robotic locomotion in PhysX , 2009, GECCO '09.

[28]  Massimo Totaro,et al.  Toward Perceptive Soft Robots: Progress and Challenges , 2018, Advanced science.

[29]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[30]  Thomas J. Wallin,et al.  3D printing of soft robotic systems , 2018, Nature Reviews Materials.

[31]  LipsonHod,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Soft Multimaterial 3D-Printed Objects , 2014 .

[32]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Softer is Harder: What Differentiates Soft Robotics from Hard Robotics? , 2018 .

[33]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[34]  Christian Duriez,et al.  Control of elastic soft robots based on real-time finite element method , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[35]  Gürsel Alici,et al.  3D Printable Vacuum-Powered Soft Linear Actuators , 2019, 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[36]  Kyung Hyun Choi,et al.  3D printing for soft robotics – a review , 2018, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[37]  Bernard Bayle,et al.  Soft Robots Manufacturing: A Review , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[38]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Highly Sensitive Soft Foam Sensors to Empower Robotic Systems , 2019, Advanced Materials Technologies.

[39]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Mechanical and electrical numerical analysis of soft liquid-embedded deformation sensors analysis , 2014 .