Large-scale imaging of high-latitude convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations

The HF radars of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) provide measurements of the E × B drift of ionospheric plasma over extended regions of the high-latitude ionosphere. With the recent augmentation of the northern hemisphere component to six radars, a sizable fraction of the entire convection zone (approximately one-third) can be imaged nearly instantaneously (∼2 min). To date, the two-dimensional convection velocity has been mapped by combining line-of-sight velocity measurements obtained from pairs of radars within common-volume areas. We describe a new method of deriving large-scale convection maps based on all the available velocity data. The measurements are used to determine a solution for the distribution of electrostatic potential, Φ, expressed as a series expansion in spherical harmonics. The addition of data from a statistical model constrains the solution in regions of no data coverage. For low-order expansions the results provide a gross characterization of the global convection. We discuss the processing of the radar velocity data, the factors that condition the fitting, and the reliability of the results. We present examples of imaging that demonstrate the response of the global convection to variations in the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). In the case of a sudden polarity change from northward to southward IMF, the convection is seen to reconfigure globally on very short (<6 min) timescales.

[1]  J. M. Ruohoniemi,et al.  Drift motions of small‐scale irregularities in the high‐latitude F region: An experimental comparison with plasma drift motions , 1987 .

[2]  T. B. Jones,et al.  DARN/SuperDARN , 1995 .

[3]  A. Ridley,et al.  Ionospheric convection during nonsteady interplanetary magnetic field conditions , 1997 .

[4]  Raymond A. Greenwald,et al.  Rates of scattering occurrence in routine HF radar observations during solar cycle maximum , 1997 .

[5]  M. Lester,et al.  High-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics as determined by the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics procedure for the conjunctive SUNDIAL/ATLAS 1/GEM period of March 28-29, 1992 , 1996 .

[6]  R. Greenwald,et al.  An HF phased‐array radar for studying small‐scale structure in the high‐latitude ionosphere , 1985 .

[7]  D. Yuan,et al.  Radar chain study of the May, 1995 storm , 1999 .

[8]  R. Heelis,et al.  Response time of the polar ionospheric convection pattern to changes in the north-south direction of the IMF. Scientific report No. 1 , 1995 .

[9]  J. Dungey.  Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones , 1961 .

[10]  Alan S. Rodger,et al.  The ionospheric response to flux transfer events: the first few minutes , 1997 .

[11]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .

[12]  W. Heikkila.  Interpretation of recent AMPTE data at the magnetopause , 1997 .

[13]  R. Greenwald,et al.  Mesoscale dayside convection vortices and their relation to substorm phase , 1996 .

[14]  R. Greenwald,et al.  Super Dual Auroral Radar Network observations of convection during a period of small‐magnitude northward IMF , 1998 .

[15]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[16]  C. O. Hines,et al.  A UNIFYING THEORY OF HIGH-LATITUDE GEOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA AND GEOMAGNETIC STORMS , 1961 .

[17]  S. Wing,et al.  A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes , 1989 .

[18]  Raymond A. Greenwald,et al.  Statistical patterns of high‐latitude convection obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations , 1996 .

[19]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  On the importance of E‐field variability for Joule heating in the high‐latitude thermosphere , 1995 .

[20]  D. Weimer,et al.  Models of high‐latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients , 1995 .