The target-setting process in the CO2 Performance Ladder: does it lead to ambitious goals for carbon dioxide emission reduction?

Abstract Energy management and carbon accounting schemes are increasingly being adopted as a corporate response to climate change. These schemes often demand the setting of ambitious targets for the reduction of corporate greenhouse gas emissions. However, only limited empirical insight is available regarding the companies' target-setting process and the auditing practice of certification agencies that evaluate ambition levels of greenhouse gas reduction targets. We studied the target-setting process of firms participating in the CO2 Performance Ladder. The CO2 Performance Ladder is a new certifiable scheme for energy management and carbon accounting that is used as a tool for green public procurement in the Netherlands. This study aimed at answering the question ‘To what extent does the current target-setting process in the CO2 Performance Ladder lead to ambitious CO2 emission reduction goals?’. An exploratory research design was used as the main research approach for this study. Data were collected through interviews with relevant stakeholders (companies, consultants, auditors and scheme owner), document reviews of the certification scheme, and monitoring reports. The research findings indicated that several certification requirements for setting CO2 emission reduction targets were interpreted differently by the various actors. Conformity checks by the auditors did not always include a full assessment of all certification requirements because of the lack of well-defined assessment criteria. The research results also indicated that corporate CO2 emission reduction targets were not ambitious. The analysis of the target-setting process revealed that there was a semi-structured bottom-up auditing practice for evaluating the corporate CO2 emission reduction targets, but the final assessments of whether target levels were sufficiently ambitious were not very well defined. The main conclusion is that the current target-setting process in the CO2 Performance Ladder did not necessarily lead to the establishment of the most ambitious goals for CO2 emission reduction. Other approaches for setting target levels, such as minimum performance levels, must be considered to maintain the CO2 Performance Ladder as a valid tool for green public procurement.

[1]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Protocol , 2004 .

[2]  L. Gunning-Schepers,et al.  Targets as a tool in health policy. Part I: Lessons learned. , 2000, Health policy.

[3]  Antero Honkasalo,et al.  The EMAS scheme: a management tool and instrument of environmental policy , 1998 .

[4]  Yoshiro Fukuda,et al.  New Perspective in Corporate Environmental Targets Reporting , 2012, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[5]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Long-term corporate climate change targets: What could they deliver? , 2013 .

[6]  M. Hilb New Corporate Governance: From Good Guidelines to Great Practice , 2005 .

[7]  Karin Edvardsson,et al.  Using Goals in Environmental Management: The Swedish System of Environmental Objectives , 2004, Environmental management.

[8]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Assessing the potential impact of the CO2 performance ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[9]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Setting SMART targets for industrial energy use and industrial energy efficiency. , 2010 .

[10]  Chukwumerije Okereke,et al.  An Exploration of Motivations, Drivers and Barriers to Carbon Management:: The UK FTSE 100 , 2007 .

[11]  K. Björnberg,et al.  Rational climate mitigation goals , 2013 .

[12]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Sustainable target value design: integrating life cycle assessment and target value design to improve building energy and environmental performance , 2015 .

[13]  H. Groenenberg,et al.  Benchmark-based emission allocation in a cap-and-trade system , 2002 .

[14]  Olof Hjelm,et al.  Auditing external environmental auditors : investigating how ISO 14001 is interpreted and applied in reality , 2001 .

[15]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1979 .

[16]  Francisco Ascui,et al.  Carbon accounting and the construction of competence , 2012 .

[17]  Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria,et al.  Shedding Light on ISO 14001 Certification Audits , 2013 .

[18]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  Sustainable Development and Certification Practices: Lessons Learned and Prospects , 2011 .

[19]  Jacob Hörisch Combating climate change through organisational innovation: an empirical analysis of internal emission trading schemes , 2013 .

[20]  R. Sullivan,et al.  An assessment of the climate change policies and performance of large European companies , 2010 .

[21]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth? , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges , 2012 .

[23]  Gregory A. Norris,et al.  Evaluating Corporate Climate Performance: A Model for Benchmarking GHG Reductions , 2007 .

[24]  S. Ramesohl,et al.  Voluntary agreements on energy efficiency in industry — not a golden key, but another contribution to improve climate policy mixes , 2002 .

[25]  A. Kolk,et al.  Market Strategies for Climate Change , 2004 .

[26]  David G. Victor,et al.  BP's emissions trading system , 2006 .

[27]  E. Ngai,et al.  Energy and utility management maturity model for sustainable manufacturing process , 2013 .

[28]  Jørgen Randers,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions per unit of value added (“GEVA”) — A corporate guide to voluntary climate action , 2012 .

[29]  Francisco Ascui,et al.  As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting , 2011 .

[30]  Thomas Zobel,et al.  Characterisation of environmental policy implementation in an EMS context : a multiple-case study in Sweden , 2008 .

[31]  Amelie Goldberg,et al.  PROMOTING ENERGY SAVINGS AND GHG MITIGATION THROUGH INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CHAIN INITIATIVES , 2013 .

[32]  Joe A. Almaguer,et al.  Superior Energy Performancecm: A Roadmap for Continual Improvement in Energy Efficiency , 2013 .

[33]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review , 2012 .