Evaluation of 8-Channel Radiative Antenna Arrays for Human Head Imaging at 10.5 Tesla

For human head magnetic resonance imaging at 10.5 tesla (T), we built an 8-channel transceiver dipole antenna array and evaluated the influence of coaxial feed cables. The influence of coaxial feed cables was evaluated in simulation and compared against a physically constructed array in terms of transmit magnetic field (B1+) and specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency. A substantial drop (23.1% in simulation and 20.7% in experiment) in B1+ efficiency was observed with a tight coaxial feed cable setup. For the investigation of the feed location, the center-fed dipole antenna array was compared to two 8-channel end-fed arrays: monopole and sleeve antenna arrays. The simulation results with a phantom indicate that these arrays achieved ~24% higher SAR efficiency compared to the dipole antenna array. For a human head model, we observed 30.8% lower SAR efficiency with the 8-channel monopole antenna array compared to the phantom. Importantly, our simulation with the human model indicates that the sleeve antenna arrays can achieve 23.8% and 21% higher SAR efficiency compared to the dipole and monopole antenna arrays, respectively. Finally, we obtained high-resolution human cadaver images at 10.5 T with the 8-channel sleeve antenna array.

[1]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Evaluation of a 16-Channel Transceiver Loop + Dipole Antenna Array for Human Head Imaging at 10.5 Tesla , 2020, IEEE Access.

[2]  Joël Mispelter,et al.  NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biomedical Experiments: Theoretical Principles and Practical Guidelines , 2006 .

[3]  Joshua H. Park,et al.  New design concept of monopole antenna array for UHF 7T MRI , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  A 16‐channel dual‐row transmit array in combination with a 31‐element receive array for human brain imaging at 9.4 T , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  G. Randy Duensing,et al.  Common mode signal rejection methods for MRI: Reduction of cable shield currents for high static magnetic field systems , 2003 .

[6]  K Scheffler,et al.  Evaluation of transmit efficiency and SAR for a tight fit transceiver human head phased array at 9.4 T , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Nicola Vanello,et al.  B(1)(+)/actual flip angle and reception sensitivity mapping methods: simulation and comparison. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Xiaoping Wu,et al.  First in‐vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Vasily L Yarnykh,et al.  Actual flip‐angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three‐dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Ultrahigh Fields , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Gregory J. Metzger,et al.  A 16‐channel combined loop‐dipole transceiver array for 7 Tesla body MRI , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Imaging at ultrahigh magnetic fields: History, challenges, and solutions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[15]  Michael B. Smith,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90°” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Taha A. Elwi,et al.  A cylindrical wideband slotted patch antenna loaded with Frequency Selective Surface for MRI applications , 2017 .

[17]  Zang-Hee Cho,et al.  Extended Monopole antenna Array with individual Shield (EMAS) coil: An improved monopole antenna design for brain imaging at 7 tesla MRI , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Zoya Popović,et al.  Excitation and RF Field Control of a Human-Size 10.5-T MRI System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[19]  Steen Moeller,et al.  A geometrically adjustable 16‐channel transmit/receive transmission line array for improved RF efficiency and parallel imaging performance at 7 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Angel Torrado-Carvajal,et al.  In vivo human head MRI at 10.5T: A radiofrequency safety study and preliminary imaging results , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  A 16-channel transceiver loop+dipole antennas head array for human head imaging at 10.5T , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA).

[23]  Riccardo Lattanzi,et al.  The Electric Dipole Array : An Attempt to Match the Ideal Current Pattern for Central SNR at 7 Tesla , 2011 .

[24]  Derek Seeber,et al.  Floating shield current suppression trap , 2004 .

[25]  Jennifer Urner,et al.  Antenna Theory And Design , 2016 .

[26]  C A T van den Berg,et al.  Design of a radiative surface coil array element at 7 T: The single‐side adapted dipole antenna , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Steen Moeller,et al.  A 32‐channel lattice transmission line array for parallel transmit and receive MRI at 7 tesla , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  A Jesmanowicz,et al.  Noise correlation , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Emanuele Schiavi,et al.  SAR reduction in 7T C‐spine imaging using a “dark modes” transmit array strategy , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Jacob K. White,et al.  The ultimate signal‐to‐noise ratio in realistic body models , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  B. Beck,et al.  Tissue‐equivalent phantoms for high frequencies , 2004 .