Improving mass detection using combined feature representations from projection views and reconstructed volume of DBT and boosting based classification with feature selection.

In digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), image characteristics of projection views and reconstructed volume are different and both have the advantage of detecting breast masses, e.g. reconstructed volume mitigates a tissue overlap, while projection views have less reconstruction blur artifacts. In this paper, an improved mass detection is proposed by using combined feature representations from projection views and reconstructed volume in the DBT. To take advantage of complementary effects on different image characteristics of both data, combined feature representations are extracted from both projection views and reconstructed volume concurrently. An indirect region-of-interest segmentation in projection views, which projects volume-of-interest in reconstructed volume into the corresponding projection views, is proposed to extract combined feature representations. In addition, a boosting based classification with feature selection has been employed for selecting effective feature representations among a large number of combined feature representations, and for reducing false positives. Experiments have been conducted on a clinical data set that contains malignant masses. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed mass detection can achieve high sensitivity with a small number of false positives. In addition, the experimental results demonstrate that the selected feature representations for classifying masses complementarily come from both projection views and reconstructed volume.

[1]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices. , 2010, Medical physics.

[3]  H P Chan,et al.  Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Multiresolution Local Binary Pattern texture analysis for false positive reduction in computerized detection of breast masses on mammograms , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2004 .

[6]  R A Schmidt,et al.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Breast mass detection using slice conspicuity in 3D reconstructed digital breast volumes , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[12]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[13]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[14]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  Andrea Botti,et al.  Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[16]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Optimizing Case-Based Detection Performance in a Multiview CAD System for Mammography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  Sukhendu Das,et al.  A Survey of Decision Fusion and Feature Fusion Strategies for Pattern Classification , 2010, IETE Technical Review.

[21]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[22]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Recent Advances in Breast Imaging, Mammography, and Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer , 2006 .

[23]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[24]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[27]  Subhash C. Bagui,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2005, Technometrics.

[28]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Konstantinos N. Plataniotis,et al.  Ensemble-based discriminant learning with boosting for face recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[30]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[31]  J M Lesniak,et al.  Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  C P Lawinski,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[34]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: From mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[35]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using fuzzy and a contrario approaches , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[36]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): improvement of false positive reduction by optimization of object segmentation , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[37]  Byung-Woo Hong,et al.  A Topographic Representation for Mammogram Segmentation , 2003, MICCAI.

[38]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Mammographic enhancement with combining local statistical measures and sliding band filter for improved mass segmentation in mammograms , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[39]  Vasile Palade,et al.  Multi-Classifier Systems: Review and a roadmap for developers , 2006, Int. J. Hybrid Intell. Syst..

[40]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[41]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[43]  Martin D. Fox,et al.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[44]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses in tomosynthesis reconstructed volumes using information-theoretic similarity measures , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[45]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[46]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[47]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[48]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Boosting Color Feature Selection for Color Face Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[49]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[50]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  The effect of feature selection methods on computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[52]  Carlos S. Pereira,et al.  Detection of Lung Nodule Candidates in Chest Radiographs , 2007, IbPRIA.