Deep Cascade Classifiers to Detect Clusters of Microcalcifications

Recent advances in Computer-Aided Detection CADe for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms show that cascade classifiers can compete with high-end commercial systems. In this paper, we introduce a deep cascade detector where the learning algorithm of each binary pixel classifier has been redesigned in the early stopping mechanism conventionally used to avoid overfitting to the training data. In this way, we strongly increase the number of features considered in each stage of the cascade hence the term "deep", yet we still benefit from the cascade framework by obtaining a very fast processing of mammograms less than one second per image. We evaluated the proposed approach on a database of full-field digital mammograms; the experiments revealed a statistically significant improvement of deep cascade with respect to the traditional cascade framework. We also obtained statistically significantly higher performance than one of the most widespread commercial CADe systems, the Hologic R2CAD ImageChecker. Specifically, at the same number of false positives per image of R2CAD 0.21, the deep cascade detected 96i¾?% of true lesions against the 90i¾?% of R2CAD, whereas at the same lesion sensitivity of R2CAD 90i¾?%, we obtained 0.05 false positives per image for the deep cascade against the 0.21 of R2CAD.

[1]  Waleed A. Yousef,et al.  Assessing classifiers in terms of the partial area under the ROC curve , 2013, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Learning from unbalanced data: A cascade-based approach for detecting clustered microcalcifications , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Detection of clustered microcalcifications using spatial point process modeling , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[4]  Frank W. Samuelson,et al.  ADVANTAGES AND EXAMPLES OF RESAMPLING FOR CAD EVALUATION , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[5]  Alessandro Bria,et al.  An effective learning strategy for cascaded object detection , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Xavier Lladó,et al.  A Boosting Based Approach for Automatic Micro-calcification Detection , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  Frank W. Samuelson,et al.  Comparing image detection algorithms using resampling , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[9]  Claudio Marrocco,et al.  A computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications , 2010, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[10]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  P. Taylor,et al.  A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. , 2012, European journal of radiology.