Calculating CVaR and bPOE for common probability distributions with application to portfolio optimization and density estimation

Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and value-at-risk, also called the superquantile and quantile, are frequently used to characterize the tails of probability distributions and are popular measures of risk in applications where the distribution represents the magnitude of a potential loss. buffered probability of exceedance (bPOE) is a recently introduced characterization of the tail which is the inverse of CVaR, much like the CDF is the inverse of the quantile. These quantities can prove very useful as the basis for a variety of risk-averse parametric engineering approaches. Their use, however, is often made difficult by the lack of well-known closed-form equations for calculating these quantities for commonly used probability distributions. In this paper, we derive formulas for the superquantile and bPOE for a variety of common univariate probability distributions. Besides providing a useful collection within a single reference, we use these formulas to incorporate the superquantile and bPOE into parametric procedures. In particular, we consider two: portfolio optimization and density estimation. First, when portfolio returns are assumed to follow particular distribution families, we show that finding the optimal portfolio via minimization of bPOE has advantages over superquantile minimization. We show that, given a fixed threshold, a single portfolio is the minimal bPOE portfolio for an entire class of distributions simultaneously. Second, we apply our formulas to parametric density estimation and propose the method of superquantiles (MOS), a simple variation of the method of moments where moments are replaced by superquantiles at different confidence levels. With the freedom to select various combinations of confidence levels, MOS allows the user to focus the fitting procedure on different portions of the distribution, such as the tail when fitting heavy-tailed asymmetric data.

[1]  B. Everitt The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics , 1998 .

[2]  Edward J. Dudewicz,et al.  Fitting the generalized lambda distribution to data: a method based on percentiles , 1999 .

[3]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[4]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[5]  Stanislav Uryasev,et al.  Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions , 2002 .

[6]  Emiliano A. Valdez,et al.  Tail Conditional Expectations for Elliptical Distributions , 2003 .

[7]  A. Kanto,et al.  On closed-form calculation of CVaR , 2005 .

[8]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  On buffered failure probability in design and optimization of structures , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Random variables, monotone relations, and convex analysis , 2014, Math. Program..

[10]  Q. Yao,et al.  Matching a Distribution by Matching Quantiles Estimation , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[11]  Udi E. Makov,et al.  Multivariate tail conditional expectation for elliptical distributions , 2016 .

[12]  Justin R. Davis,et al.  Analysis of tropical storm damage using buffered probability of exceedance , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[13]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Cash flow matching with risks controlled by buffered probability of exceedance and conditional value-at-risk , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[15]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Estimation and asymptotics for buffered probability of exceedance , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Buffered Probability of Exceedance: Mathematical Properties and Optimization , 2018, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Maximization of AUC and Buffered AUC in binary classification , 2018, Mathematical Programming.