Characterizing visual performance in mice: an objective and automated system based on the optokinetic reflex.

Testing optokinetic head or eye movements is an established method to determine visual performance of laboratory animals, including chickens, guinea pigs, mice, or fish. It is based on the optokinetic reflex which causes the animals to track a drifting stripe pattern with eye and head movements. We have developed an improved version of the optomotor test with better control over the stimulus parameters, as well as a high degree of automation. The stripe pattern is presented on computer monitors surrounding the animal. By tracking the head position of freely moving animals in real time, the visual angle under which the stripes of the pattern appeared was kept constant even for changing head positions. Furthermore, an algorithm was developed for automated evaluation of the tracking performance of the animal. Comparing the automatically determined behavioral score with manual assessment of the animals' tracking behavior confirmed the reliability of our methodology. As an example, we reproduced the known contrast sensitivity function of wild type mice. Furthermore, the progressive decline in visual performance of a mouse model of retinal degeneration, rd10, was demonstrated.

[1]  J. Heckenlively,et al.  Two mouse retinal degenerations caused by missense mutations in the β-subunit of rod cGMP phosphodiesterase gene , 2007, Vision Research.

[2]  Andrew D. Zaharia,et al.  The Detection of Visual Contrast in the Behaving Mouse , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  L. Pinto,et al.  Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus) , 1976, Vision Research.

[4]  Andreas Wenzel,et al.  Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in mouse models of retinal degeneration. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  M. McCall,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis of the outer plexiform layer in the nob mouse shows no abnormalities , 2003, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  Tiansen Li,et al.  Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the β subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase , 1990, Nature.

[7]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: Some surprising differences , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  R M Douglas,et al.  Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Hauswirth,et al.  Long-term retinal function and structure rescue using capsid mutant AAV8 vector in the rd10 mouse, a model of recessive retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[10]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  Andreas Wenzel,et al.  Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  Enrica Strettoi,et al.  Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: A morphological and ERG study , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  Dyonne T Hartong,et al.  Retinitis pigmentosa , 2009 .

[15]  J. Takahashi,et al.  Interpretation of the mouse electroretinogram , 2007, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[16]  Douglas S Kim,et al.  Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Ardigó,et al.  Noninvasive, in vivo assessment of comedone re‐formation , 2015, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[18]  Picaud Serge,et al.  The optomotor response: A robust first-line visual screening method for mice , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  B. Boycott Visual Physiology , 1973, Nature.

[20]  S. Sadda,et al.  Modulatory influence of stimulus parameters on optokinetic head-tracking response , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  R. Douglas,et al.  Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Gopi N. Maguluri,et al.  Monitoring mouse retinal degeneration with high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Journal of vision.