Spatial Quality Assessment of Pan-Sharpened High Resolution Satellite Imagery Based on an Automatically Estimated Edge Based Metric

Most of the existing pan-sharpening quality assessment methods consider only the spectral quality and there are just few investigations, which concentrate on spatial characteristics. Spatial quality of pan-sharpened images is vital in elaborating the capability of object extraction, identification, or reconstruction, especially regarding man-made objects and their application for large scale mapping in urban areas. This paper presents an Edge based image Fusion Metric (EFM) for spatial quality evaluation of pan-sharpening in high resolution satellite imagery. Considering Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) as a precise measurement of edge response, MTFs of pan-sharpened images are assessed and compared to those obtained from the original multispectral or panchromatic images. Spatial quality assessment of pan-sharpening is done by comparison of MTF curves of the pan-sharpened and reference images. The capability of the proposed method is evaluated by quality assessment of two different residential and industrial urban areas of WorldView-2 pan-sharpened images. Obtained results clearly show the wide spatial discrepancy in quality of Pan-sharpened images, resulting from different fusion methods, and confirm the need for spatial quality assessment of fused products. The results also prove the capability of the proposed EFM as a powerful tool for evaluation and comparison of different image fusion techniques and products.

[1]  W. Shi,et al.  Wavelet-based image fusion and quality assessment , 2005 .

[2]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: Assessing the quality of resulting images , 1997 .

[3]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Quality of high resolution synthesised images: Is there a simple criterion ? , 2000 .

[4]  Peter Reinartz,et al.  Analysis and selection of pan-sharpening assessment measures , 2012 .

[5]  Lucien Wald,et al.  A MTF-Based Distance for the Assessment of Geometrical Quality of Fused Products , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  Te-Ming Tu,et al.  A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods , 2001, Inf. Fusion.

[8]  Daniel L. Civco,et al.  Assessing the spatial fidelity of resolution-enhanced imagery using Fourier analysis: a proof-of-concept study , 2012, Remote Sensing.

[9]  S. Sangwine,et al.  The Colour Image Processing Handbook , 1998, Springer US.

[10]  Thierry Ranchin,et al.  Comparison of different algorithms for the improvement of the spatial resolution of images , 2000 .

[11]  Lucien Wald,et al.  A review of earth-viewing methods for in-flight assessment of modulation transfer function and noise of optical spaceborne sensors , 2009 .

[12]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing , 2010 .

[13]  T. H. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of pansharpening algorithms in support of earth observation based rapid-mapping workflows , 2013 .

[14]  Firouz Abdullah Al-Wassai,et al.  Spatial and Spectral Quality Evaluation Based on Edges Regions of Satellite: Image Fusion , 2012, 2012 Second International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies.

[15]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Wavelet based image fusion techniques — An introduction, review and comparison , 2007 .

[16]  Firouz Abdullah Al-Wassai,et al.  A Novel Metric Approach Evaluation For The Spatial Enhancement Of Pan-Sharpened Images , 2012, ArXiv.

[17]  J. Zhou,et al.  A wavelet transform method to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic data , 1998 .

[18]  Yun Zhang,et al.  An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images , 2005, Inf. Fusion.

[19]  Josaphat Tetuko Sri Sumantyo,et al.  Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[20]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Comparison between Mallat's and the ‘à trous’ discrete wavelet transform based algorithms for the fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images , 2005 .

[21]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Pansharpening Quality Assessment Using the Modulation Transfer Functions of Instruments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[23]  Dennis L. Helder,et al.  GENERIC SENSOR MODELING FOR MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION (MTF) ESTIMATION , 2005 .

[24]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Image Features from Phase Congruency , 1995 .

[25]  Annes Philip,et al.  A Review on Pixel Level Satellite Image Fusion , 2012 .

[26]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.