Collaborative е-Rulemaking, Democratic Bots, and the Future of Digital Democracy

This article focuses on “deliberative e-rulemaking”: digital consultation processes that seek to facilitate public deliberation over policy or regulatory proposals [1, 2]. The main challenge of е-rulemaking platforms is to support an “intelligent” deliberative process that enables decision makers to identify a wide range of options, weigh the relevant considerations, and develop epistemically responsible solutions. This article discusses and critiques two approaches to this challenge: The Cornell RegulationRoom project and model of computationally assisted regulatory participation by Livermore et al. It then proceeds to explore two alternative approaches to e-rulemaking: One is based on the implementation of collaborative, wiki-styled tools. This article discusses the findings of an experiment, which was conducted at Bar-Ilan University and explored various aspects of a wiki-based collaborative е-rulemaking system. The second approach follows a more futuristic approach, focusing on the potential development of autonomous, artificial democratic agents. This article critically discusses this alternative, also in view of the recent debate regarding the idea of “augmented democracy.”

[1]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[2]  Ralf Lindner,et al.  Broadening Participation Through E‐Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament , 2011 .

[3]  Serge Demeyer,et al.  Among the Machines: Human-Bot Interaction on Social Q&A Websites , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Christophe Boone,et al.  Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  Michael A. Livermore,et al.  Computationally Assisted Regulatory Participation , 2018 .

[6]  S. Coleman,et al.  Deliberative Manoeuvres in the Digital Darkness: E-Democracy Policy in the UK , 2014 .

[7]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  P. Resnick,et al.  Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design , 2012 .

[10]  Samuel C. Woolley,et al.  Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics , 2016, First Monday.

[11]  Nathaniel J. Klemp,et al.  From Town-Halls to Wikis: Exploring Wikipedia’s Implications for Deliberative Democracy , 2010 .

[12]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion , 2016, First Monday.

[13]  Henrik Serup Christensen,et al.  Deliberation and Opinion Change: Evidence from a Deliberative Mini-public in Finland , 2014 .

[14]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Impact of social value orientation on energy conservation in different behavioral domains , 2013 .

[16]  Tanja Aitamurto,et al.  The value of crowdsourcing in public policymaking: epistemic, democratic and economic value , 2017 .

[17]  Arthur D. Santana Virtuous or Vitriolic , 2014 .

[18]  Dan Mercea,et al.  The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News , 2017 .

[19]  C. Premat Can the French Republic Be Digital? Lessons from the Last Participatory Experience on the Law-Making Process , 2018 .

[20]  Mohammad Hamdaqa,et al.  Blockchain-Based E-Voting System , 2018, 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD).

[21]  G. Teubner Digital Personhood? The Status of Autonomous Software Agents in Private Law , 2018 .

[22]  Savvas Zannettou,et al.  A pr 2 01 8 The Web of False Information : Rumors , Fake News , Hoaxes , Clickbait , and Various Other Shenanigans , 2018 .

[23]  Gilly Leshed,et al.  The Magic Sauce: Practices of Facilitation in Online Policy Deliberation , 2016, Regular Issue.

[24]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Oren Perez Open Government, Technological Innovation and the Politics of Democratic Disillusionment: (E-)Democracy from Socrates to Obama , 2012 .

[26]  Jay D. Hmielowski,et al.  Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor , 2012 .

[27]  A. Chadwick Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[28]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Oren Perez Fuzzy Law: A Theory of Quasi-Legal Systems , 2015, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence.

[30]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in wikipedia , 2013, CSCW.

[31]  J. Hoff The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy , 2010 .

[32]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter , 2015, CSCW.

[33]  A. Pole,et al.  Potato Chips, Cookies, and Candy Oh My! Public Commentary on Proposed Rules Regulating Competitive Foods , 2017, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[34]  Kim Strandberg Designing for democracy?: an experimental study comparing the outcomes of citizen discussions in online forums with those of online discussions in a forum designed according to deliberative principles , 2014, European Political Science Review.

[35]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Deliberative E-Rulemaking Project: Challenges to Enacting Real World Deliberation , 2012 .

[36]  S. W. Yackee,et al.  Assessing Regulatory Participation by Health Professionals: A Study of State Health Rulemaking , 2013 .

[37]  Ian Rowe,et al.  Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion , 2015 .

[38]  Jennifer Shkabatur Crossroads : Digital Technology and Local Democracy in America , 2015 .

[39]  C. Parks,et al.  Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[40]  Johann Füller,et al.  Explaining voluntary citizen online participation using the concept of citizenship: an explanatory study on an open government platform , 2014, Journal of Business Economics.

[41]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents , 1996, ATAL.

[42]  Martin Lodge,et al.  Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews: A new way of challenging red tape in British government? , 2015 .

[43]  Christian Iaione,et al.  The CO-City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City , 2016 .

[44]  T. Heikka The Rise of the Mediating Citizen: Time, Space, and Citizenship in the Crowdsourcing of Finnish Legislation , 2015 .

[45]  Bo Zhao Digital Democracy in a Globalized World , 2016 .

[46]  Anne Joseph O'Connell,et al.  The Lost World of Administrative Law , 2014 .

[47]  J. Ripberger,et al.  Public Attention and Head-to-Head Campaign Fundraising: An Examination of U.S. Senate Elections , 2017 .

[48]  Todd Graham,et al.  Analysing 'super-participation' in online third spaces , 2014 .

[49]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Note - To Continue Sharing or Not to Continue Sharing? An Empirical Analysis of User Decision in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Networks , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Peter John,et al.  Taking Political Engagement Online: An Experimental Analysis of Asynchronous Discussion Forums , 2011 .

[52]  Elizabeth S. Smith,et al.  Who Taught You to Talk Like That?: The University and Online Political Discourse , 2013 .

[53]  D. Balliet,et al.  Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering , 2011 .

[54]  H. Roberts,et al.  Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate , 2015 .

[55]  Kevin R. Parker,et al.  Wiki as a Teaching Tool , 2007 .

[56]  P. Quirk,et al.  Rhetoric and Reality: Going beyond Discourse Ethics in Assessing Legislative Deliberation , 2010 .

[57]  M. Vugt Abslracl Commuting by car or public transportation ? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements , 2004 .

[58]  Dmitry Epstein,et al.  The Value of Words : Narrative as Evidence in Policymaking , 2012 .

[59]  Stephanie L. Kimbro Increasing Online Engagement between the Public and the Legal Profession with Gamification , 2015 .

[60]  Mary J. Newhart,et al.  Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository , 2013 .

[61]  J. Joireman,et al.  Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[62]  Net Neutrality| Closing the Technocratic Divide? Activist Intermediaries, Digital Form Letters, and Public Involvement in FCC Policy Making , 2016 .

[63]  Gregory D. Jones Electronic Rulemaking in the New Age of Openness: Proposing a Voluntary Two-Tier Registration System for Regulations.gov , 2010 .

[64]  Sonia Royo,et al.  E‐Participation and Environmental Protection: Are Local Governments Really Committed? , 2014 .

[65]  Dennis M. Wilkinson,et al.  Strong regularities in online peer production , 2008, EC '08.

[66]  Y. Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The prospects of E-democracy: an experimental study of collaborative E-rulemaking , 2018, Journal of Information Technology & Politics.

[67]  B. Noveck Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[68]  Todd Graham,et al.  Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of "Superparticipants" , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Allan Tomlinson,et al.  Analysis Of Electronic Voting Schemes In The Real World , 2018, UKAIS.

[70]  Stuart W. Shulman The Case Against Mass E-mails: Perverse Incentives and Low Quality Public Participation in U.S. Federal Rulemaking , 2009 .

[71]  Mary J. Newhart,et al.  Rulemaking vs. Democracy: Judging and Nudging Public Participation That Counts , 2012, Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law.

[72]  Chun-Chia Lee,et al.  Designing Attractive Gamification Features for Collaborative Storytelling Websites , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[73]  Naren B. Peddibhotla,et al.  Contributing to Public Document Repositories: A Critical Mass Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[74]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Drivers of Quantity and Quality of Participation in Online Policy Deliberation Forums , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Susan Webb Yackee Participant Voice in the Bureaucratic Policymaking Process , 2015 .

[76]  R. Cohen,et al.  Governance through Global Networks and Corporate Signaling , 2018, Regulation & Governance.