Suppose a seller wants to sell k similar or identical objects and there are n > k potential buyers. Suppose that each buyer wants only one object. In this case, we suggest the use of a simultaneous auction that would work as follows. Players are asked to submit sealed bids for one object. The individual with the highest bid chooses an object first; the individual with the second-highest bid chooses the next object; and this process continues until the individual with the kth highest bid receives the last object. Each individual pays the equivalent to his or her bid. When objects are identical, we show that the proposed auction generates the same revenue as a first-price sealed-bid sequential auction. When objects are perfectly correlated, there is no known solution for sequential auctions, whereas we can characterize bidding strategies in the proposed auction. Moreover, the proposed auction is optimal (given an appropriately chosen reserve price), and it may be easier and cheaper to run than a sequential auction.
[1]
Kerry D. Vandell,et al.
On the use of auctions as a disposition strategy for RTC real estate assets: A policy perspective
,
1992
.
[2]
Jeremy I. Bulow,et al.
The Simple Economics of Optimal Auctions
,
1989,
Journal of Political Economy.
[3]
C. Mayer.
A Model of Negotiated Sales Applied to Real Estate Auctions
,
1995
.
[4]
D. Quan.
Real estate auctions: A survey of theory and practice
,
1994
.
[5]
B HauschDonald,et al.
Multi-Object Auctions
,
1986
.
[6]
Strategic behavior in pooled condominium auctions
,
1992
.
[7]
Ian L. Gale,et al.
Bottom-Fishing and Declining Prices in Sequential Auctions
,
1994
.
[8]
Roger B. Myerson,et al.
Optimal Auction Design
,
1981,
Math. Oper. Res..
[9]
Flavio M. Menezes,et al.
Sequential asymmetric auctions with endogenous participation
,
1994
.