Post-stall motions evolving toward chaos

The spin of an airplane occurs for angles of attack beyond stall, where nonlinear aerodynamics dominates and where complex and unpredictable behaviors might induce to question whether or not such a motion is chaotic. To find an answer to this issue, wind-tunnel tests are carried out on a model of a fighter attached by its center of gravity through an universal joint that allows only the three rotations. These degrees of freedom are analyzed according to modem techniques for the study of "supposedly chaotic data." It is found that, for increasing Reynolds number, successive bifurcations take place with a consequent more complex structure of the attractor, which reveals some features typical of quasi-periodic systems evolving toward chaos. The model is tested also in other configurations (different nose and/or leading-edge extensions, presence or absence of tail planes) so as to verify the dependence of the motion on some details. It is found that unpredictability and strong dependence on the initial conditions characterize the basic configuration, whereas a blunt nose and leading-edge extensions make the motion extremely regular. Even though the system might be on its route to chaos, a fully developed chaotic behavior is not observed.

[1]  Raman K. Mehra,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of Nonlinear Aircraft Dynamics , 1982 .

[2]  Dong-Chan Lee,et al.  Angular Momentum Control in Nonlinear Flight , 2000 .

[3]  W. M. Adams,et al.  Analytic prediction of aircraft spin characteristics and analysis of spin recovery. , 1972 .

[4]  C. Michael Fremaux.  Spin-Tunnel Investigation of a 1/28-Scale Model of the NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV) with and without Vertical Tails , 1997 .

[5]  W. P. Gilbert,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Forebody and Wing Leading-Edge Vortex Interactions at High Angles of Attack, , 1983 .

[6]  G. K. Miller,et al.  An analytical technique for the analysis of airplane spin entry and recovery , 1982 .

[7]  P. Guicheteau.  Stability analysis through bifurcation theory, 2 , 1993 .

[8]  F. Takens.  Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[9]  D. J. Dicarlo,et al.  Flight investigation of stall, spin and recovery characteristics of a low-wing, single-engine, T-tail light airplane , 1985 .

[10]  N. Ananthkrishnan,et al.  Aircraft Spin Recovery, with and without Thrust Vectoring, Using Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion , 2005 .

[11]  A. M. Skow,et al.  Control of the forebody vortex orientation by asymmetric air injection. Part A: Application to enhance departure/spin recovery of fighter aircraft and Part B: Details of the flow structure , 1982 .

[12]  James Planeaux.  Thrust contributions to the spin characteristics of a model fighter aircraft , 1991 .

[13]  Non-linear flight dynamics at high angles-of-attack , 1998, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[14]  Dong-Chan Lee,et al.  Momentum vector control for spin recovery , 2000 .

[15]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Analytical aerodynamic model of a high alpha research vehicle wind-tunnel model , 1990 .

[16]  J. P. Reding,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamics of Slender Delta Wings at Large Angles of Attack , 1975 .

[17]  Paul T. Jamarillo.  An analysis of falling leaf suppression strategies for the F/A-18D , 1996 .

[18]  Carlos J. Suarez,et al.  Forebody vortex control using slot blowing , 1991 .

[19]  A. V. Khramtsovsky,et al.  Application of continuation and bifurcation methods to the design of control systems , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  E. Ott.  Strange attractors and chaotic motions of dynamical systems , 1981 .

[21]  J. R. Chambers,et al.  Effects of a pointed nose on spin characteristics of a fighter airplane model including correlation with theoretical calculations , 1970 .

[22]  James S. Bowman,et al.  Recent Experience with Techniques for Prediction of Spin Characteristics of Fighter Aircraft , 1971 .

[23]  Mikhail Goman,et al.  Application of bifurcation methods to nonlinear flight dynamics problems , 1997 .

[24]  Gary T. Chapman,et al.  Nonlinear problems in flight dynamics involving aerodynamic bifurcations , 1985 .

[25]  Celso Grebogi,et al.  Extracting unstable periodic orbits from chaotic time series data , 1997 .

[26]  Mark A. Croom,et al.  Research on the F/A-18E/F Using a 22%-Dynamically-Scaled Drop Model , 2000 .

[27]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[28]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[29]  H. Paul Stough,et al.  Flight investigation of the effect of tail configuration on stall, spin, and recovery characteristics of a low-wing general aviation research airplane , 1987 .

[30]  P. Bergé,et al.  L'ordre dans le chaos. , 1984 .

[31]  M. B. Tischler,et al.  Determination of the Spin and Recovery Characteristics of a General Aviation Design , 1981 .

[32]  Nicholas B. Tufillaro,et al.  Experimental approach to nonlinear dynamics and chaos , 1992, Studies in nonlinearity.

[33]  M. Lowenberg.  Bifurcation analysis of multiple–attractor flight dynamics , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  M. Tobak,et al.  Bifurcation Theory Applied to Aircraft Motions , 1985 .

[35]  R. Devaney.  An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems , 1990 .

[36]  Ralph D. Kimberlin,et al.  Flight testing of fixed-wing aircraft , 2003 .