Shape-from-shading on a cloudy day

In the classical shape-from-shading model, surface luminance depends primarily on the unit surface normal. However, under diffuse lighting conditions, such as the sky on a cloudy day, luminance depends primarily on the amount of sky that is visible from each surface element, with surface normal of secondary importance. This claim is formalized in terms of a dominating sky principle and a surface aperture function. An approximately functional constraint between surface luminance and aperture emerges. It is shown how to use this constraint to recover a depth map from an image efficiently. A curious difference from the classical shape-from-shading problem is uncovered. When one assumes a point light source, the local geometric constraints of the shape-from-shading problem lie along the surface. However, in the diffuse-lighting problem, the local geometric constraints are found in a visibility field, which is defined in the free space above the surface.

[1]  M. Levoy,et al.  The light field , 1939 .

[2]  Raymond Baxter Dowden,et al.  The Natural Way To Draw , 1941 .

[3]  Berthold K. P. Horn Understanding Image Intensities , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[4]  B K Horn,et al.  Calculating the reflectance map. , 1979, Applied optics.

[5]  R. Wehner Spatial Vision in Arthropods , 1981 .

[6]  W A Richards,et al.  Lightness scale from image intensity distributions. , 1981, Applied optics.

[7]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Geometrical modes as a general method to treat diffuse interreflections in radiometry , 1983 .

[8]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Modeling the interaction of light between diffuse surfaces , 1984, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Reflections on Shading , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Qualitative shape from active shading , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  W. Richards,et al.  Why is snow so bright , 1992 .