A two-compartment gel phantom for optimization and quality assurance in clinical BOLD fMRI.

Clinical applications of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) depend heavily on robust paradigms, imaging methods and analysis procedures. In this work, as a means to optimize and perform quality assurance of the entire imaging and analysis chain, a phantom that provides a well known and reproducible signal change similar to a block type fMRI experiment is presented. It consists of two gel compartments with slightly different T2 that dynamically enter and leave the imaged volume. The homogeneous gel in combination with a cylindrical geometry results in a well-defined T*2 difference causing a signal difference between the two compartments in T*2-weighted MR images. From time series data obtained with the phantom, maps of percent signal change (PSC) and t-values are calculated. As an example of image parameter optimisation, the phantom is demonstrated to be useful for accurate determination of the influence of echo time (TE) on BOLD fMRI results, taking the t-value as a measure of sensitivity. In addition, the phantom is proposed as a tool for quality assurance (QA) since reproducible time series and t-maps are obtained in a series of independent repeat experiments. The phantom is relatively simple to build and can therefore be used by any clinical fMRI center.

[1]  John Jonides,et al.  Studying mind and brain with fMRI. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[2]  A. Macovski Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  L. Axel,et al.  Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  The clinical potential of functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  K Willmes,et al.  Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  Stefan Sunaert,et al.  Presurgical planning for tumor resectioning , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Seung-Schik Yoo,et al.  Selection of voxel size and slice orientation for fMRI in the presence of susceptibility field gradients: application to imaging of the amygdala , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Larsson,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3t as a clinical tool in patients with intracranial tumors , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[12]  Karl Zilles,et al.  Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  S. Posse,et al.  Enhancement of BOLD‐contrast sensitivity by single‐shot multi‐echo functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R T Constable,et al.  Quantifying and comparing region-of-interest activation patterns in functional brain MR imaging: methodology considerations. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Spin‐echo and gradient‐echo epi of human brain activation using bold contrast: A comparative study at 1.5 T , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[19]  John A Detre,et al.  Clinical applicability of functional MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  L E Olsson,et al.  Nickel-doped agarose gel phantoms in MR imaging. , 1991, Acta radiologica.

[22]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Functional phantom for fMRI: a feasibility study. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  J A Sorenson,et al.  ROC methods for evaluation of fMRI techniques , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  George R Duensing,et al.  SmartPhantom--an fMRI simulator. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Impact of signal‐to‐noise on functional MRI , 2000 .

[27]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Simple measurement of scanner stability for functional NMR imaging of activation in the brain , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Lee Friedman,et al.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.