Treating drug-resistant tuberculosis in a low-intensity chronic conflict setting in India

IntroductionThe eastern part of India has been affected by an ongoing low-intensity conflict between government forces and armed Maoist groups, known as Naxalites. Since 2006, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has been providing primary health care services in the conflict-affected region along the Andhra Pradesh-Chhattisgarh border. In 2011, treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) was included in the services provided. This report aims to describe MSF experiences of providing treatment to DR-TB patients in a mobile primary health care outpatient clinic, in a low-intensity conflict setting in India.Case descriptionA total of thirteen patients were diagnosed with drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) between January 2011 and October 2013. An innovative treatment model was developed which delegated responsibility to non-TB clinicians, including primary-care nurses and nurse-aids who were remotely supported by a TB-specialist from the MSF DR-TB project in Mumbai. Individualised regimens were designed for each patient based on WHO guidelines. Of these 13 patients, 10 patients had an outcome, of whom seven (70%) patients were cured. One patient became lost to follow-up prior to treatment initiation, one patient died prior to starting treatment and one patient refused treatment. Three patients were on-treatment, were clinically improving and were culture-negative at the end of their intensive phase of treatment.Discussion and evaluationDrug-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment is a highly specialised and technical subject which requires continued patient follow-up. However, our study demonstrates that it is feasible to manage DR-TB patients in a conflict setting, using a primary-care model with remote expert support. Long-term commitment and sustainability are essential for continued care, even more so in similar conflict settings. Loss to follow-up in patients remains a programmatic challenge and community involvement may play a key role.ConclusionManaging DR-TB in a primary health care programme is feasible in a low-conflict setting with an appropriate treatment model. Ambulatory strategies and standardised treatment regimens should be considered to further simplify treatment delivery and allow for scale-up when needed.

[1]  C. Paramasivan,et al.  Drug resistance in tuberculosis in India. , 2004, The Indian journal of medical research.

[2]  N. Ford,et al.  Treatment outcomes for children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[3]  D. O’Brien,et al.  The ‘frozen state’ of drug‐resistant tuberculosis: notes from the field in Abkhazia , 2011, Internal medicine journal.

[4]  E. Pontali,et al.  Ambulatory Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients in a Slum Setting in Mumbai, India , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Donna Neuberg,et al.  Community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Surveillance of drug resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs in districts of Hoogli in West Bengal and Mayurbhanj in Orissa. , 2005 .

[7]  J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Treatment Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  R. Venkatesan,et al.  Prevalence of acquired MDR-TB and HIV co-infection. , 2002, The Indian journal of chest diseases & allied sciences.

[9]  Florian T. Furtak Human Rights Watch (HRW) , 2015 .

[10]  Evan W. Orenstein,et al.  Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[11]  V. Chadha Tuberculosis epidemiology in India: a review. , 2005, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.