Integrated Methodology for Evaluation of Energy Performance of the Building Enclosures — Part 1: Test Program Development

As a result of increased concern with energy consumption in the industrial world, it is only natural to look towards the building sector to seek significant improvements to meet expectations of the society. After all, the building sector consumes more energy than the transportation sector. Yet, the procedures that are used to define the thermal performance of, for example a wall, are typically based on the tests performed on dry materials, without consideration of air and moisture movements. In other words, these tests represent arbitrary rating conditions because we know that the energy performance of materials and building assemblies are affected by moisture and air flows. It is believed that to improve their energy performance one must have more precise means of evaluation of their field performance that would also include the consideration of air and moisture transfer conditions. In the first part of this article a background for the evaluation of thermal performance by traditional testing with calibrated boxes shows that use of these tests is limited. The average heat flow that they measure is sufficient to rate the wall assemblies but insufficient to calculate its thermal performance under field conditions. To include the effect of climate on thermal performance one must use computer models that are capable of simultaneous calculations of heat, air, and moisture transfer. Effectively, to characterize energy performance of the building enclosure one must simultaneously use assembly testing and modeling, i.e., an integrated methodology. In the second part of the article, this integrated testing and modeling methodology is applied to a few selected residential and commercial walls to highlight the magnitude of air flow effects on the steady-state thermal resistance. The integrated methodology proposed by Syracuse University includes several other aspects of hygrothermal performance evaluations. Those aspects will be addressed in later parts of this article series.

[1]  Joseph Lstiburek,et al.  Evaluating the Air Pressure Response of Multizonal Buildings , 2002 .

[2]  Cp Hedlin,et al.  A Method for Determining the Thermal Resistances of Experimental Flat Roof Systems Using Heat Flow Meters , 1980 .

[3]  Mark Bomberg,et al.  On validation of hygric characteristics for heat, air, moisture models , 2006 .

[4]  Kumar Kumaran,et al.  Effect of Exfiltration on the Hygrothermal Behaviour of a Residential Wall Assembly , 1996 .

[5]  J. Lstiburek,et al.  Toward an understanding and prediction of air flow in buildings , 2000 .

[6]  William C. Brown,et al.  Water Management in Exterior Wall Claddings , 1997 .

[7]  Sivert Uvsløkk,et al.  The Importance of Wind Barriers for Insulated Timber Frame Constructions , 1996 .

[8]  Jeffrey E. Christian,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Fasteners and Gaps between Insulation Boards on Thermal Performance of Low-Slope Roofs , 2000 .

[9]  Mark Bomberg,et al.  A Comparative Test Method to Determine Thermal Resistance under Field Conditions , 1994 .

[10]  Brown,et al.  Long-Term Field Monitoring of an EIFS Clad Wall , 1997 .

[11]  D. M. Greason,et al.  Calculated versus measured thermal resistances of simulated building walls incorporating airspaces , 1983 .

[12]  Mark Bomberg,et al.  Laboratory and roofing exposures of cellular plastic insulation to verify a model of aging , 1994 .

[13]  J. Carmeliet,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Hygric Properties of Porous Building Materials , 2004 .

[14]  Joseph Lstiburek,et al.  Transient Interaction of Buildings with HVAC Systems— Updating the State of the Art , 2000 .

[15]  D. Derome.  Moisture Accumulation in Cellulose Insulation Caused by Air Leakage in Flat Wood Frame Roofs , 2005 .

[16]  Stig Geving,et al.  Measurements and Two-Dimensional Computer Simulations of the Hygrothermal Performance of a Wood Frame Wall , 1997 .