Techniques for determining the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis

SummaryEach of the presently available noninvasive methods used to determine the nature and degree of changes in skeletal mass has significant advantages and limitations. Dual photon absorptiometric techniques generally have a very low radiation dose. They are also less expensive to construct than other systems. However, they provide information only on a highly localized portion of the axial skeleton. Computed tomography offers significant potential advantages over other techniques, but requires further work for the solution of inherent technical problems. Similarly, considerable additional work is required for the Compton scattering technique; the technical problems associated with this are even more formidable. Neutron activation analysis permits the direct in vivo measurement of total calcium content of the body and hence, skeletal mass. However, while there is vast clinical and research experience with partial body and total body neutron activation, the techniques are generally not routinely available for application in clinical centers. The question as to whether DPA of the spine, or total body calcium measurement best reflects changes in bone mass after therapy has not been resolved.

[1]  W. Nelp,et al.  Relationship between local and total bone mass in osteoporosis. , 1975, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[2]  S. Cohn The present state of in vivo neutron activation analysis in clinical diagnosis and therapy. , 1980, Atomic energy review.

[3]  J. Aloia,et al.  Changes in body chemical composition with age measured by total-body neutron activation. , 1976, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[4]  S. Cohn In vivo neutron activation analysis: state of the art and future prospects. , 1981, Medical physics.

[5]  Cohn Sh The present state of in vivo neutron activation analysis in clinical diagnosis and therapy. , 1980 .

[6]  R. Mazess,et al.  Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry , 1981, Calcified Tissue International.

[7]  W. Nelp,et al.  Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[8]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Long-term reproducibility of bone mineral content measurements. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[9]  K.,et al.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  R. Mazess,et al.  Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry in metabolic bone disease , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  H. Atkins,et al.  Absolute and relative deficit in total-skeletal calcium and radial bone mineral in osteoporosis. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S. Rockoff,et al.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[13]  P. Tothill,et al.  The comparison of neutron activation analysis and photon absorptiometry at the same part-body site. , 1981, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[14]  S. Cohn,et al.  Effect of aging on bone mass in adult women. , 1976, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  S. Cohn,et al.  Non-Invasive Measurements of Bone Mass and Their Clinical Application , 1981 .