Publish or Drop Traffic Event Alerts? Quality-aware Decision Making in Participatory Sensing-based Vehicular CPS

Vehicular cyber-physical systems (VCPS), among several other applications, may help address an ever-increasing challenge of traffic congestion in large cities. Nevertheless, VCPS can be hindered by information falsification problem, resulting due to the wrong perception of a traffic event or deliberate faking by the participating vehicles. Such information fabrication causes the re-routing of vehicles and artificial congestion, leading to economic, safety, environmental, and health hazards. Thus, it is imperative to infer truthful traffic information in real-time to restore the operational reliability of the VCPS. In this work, we propose a novel reputation scoring and decision support framework, called Spoofed and False Report Eradicator (SAFE), which offers a cost-effective and efficient solution to handle information falsification problem in the VCPS domain. The framework includes humans in the sensing loop by exploiting the paradigm of participatory sensing, a concept of a mobile security agent (MSA) to nullify the effects of deliberate false contribution, and a variant of the distance bounding mechanism to thwart location-spoofing attacks. A regression-based model integrates these effects to generate the expected truthfulness of a participant’s contribution. To determine if any contribution is true or false, a generalized linear model is used to transform the expected truthfulness into a Quality of Contribution (QoC) score. The QoC of different reports is aggregated to compute user reputation. Such reputation enables classification of different participation behaviors. Finally, an Expected Utility Theory (EUT)-based decision model is proposed that utilizes the reputation score to determine if event-specific information should be published or dropped. To evaluate the SAFE framework through experimental study, we used both simulated and real data to compare its reputation-based user segregation performance with state-of-the-art frameworks. Experimental results exhibit that SAFE captures the fine differences in participants’ behavior through the quality and quantity of participation, and the accuracy of their informed location. It also significantly improves operational reliability through publishing the information of only legitimate events.

[1]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  An Algebra for Assessing Trust in Certification Chains , 1999, NDSS.

[2]  Gang Wang,et al.  Poster: Defending against Sybil Devices in Crowdsourced Mapping Services , 2016, MobiSys '16 Companion.

[3]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Eviction of Misbehaving and Faulty Nodes in Vehicular Networks , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Damla Turgut,et al.  Defense against Sybil attack in vehicular ad hoc network based on roadside unit support , 2009, MILCOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[5]  Kyung-Ah Shim,et al.  ${\cal CPAS}$: An Efficient Conditional Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for Vehicular Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  A Security and Privacy Review of VANETs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Pengfei Zhang,et al.  A Trust-based Mixture of Gaussian Processes Model for Robust Participatory Sensing , 2017, AAMAS.

[8]  Expected Utility Theory , 2007 .

[9]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  M. Hansen,et al.  Participatory Sensing , 2019, Internet of Things.

[11]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  Trust-based privacy-aware participant selection in social participatory sensing , 2015, J. Inf. Secur. Appl..

[12]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  IEEE 802.11p: Towards an International Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  Eran Yahav,et al.  Exploiting Social Navigation , 2014, ArXiv.

[14]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  FIDES: A trust-based framework for secure user incentivization in participatory sensing , 2014, Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks 2014.

[15]  Xue Liu,et al.  Location Cheating: A Security Challenge to Location-Based Social Network Services , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[16]  Wen Hu,et al.  On the need for a reputation system in mobile phone based sensing , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[17]  Wei Yu,et al.  Securing Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems , 2015 .

[18]  Robert A Reiss,et al.  FREEWAY INCIDENT MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK , 1991 .

[19]  Soumya K. Ghosh,et al.  CAT: Consensus-assisted trust estimation of MDS-equipped collaborators in vehicular ad-hoc network , 2015, Veh. Commun..

[20]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  Vehicular Cyber Physical Systems , 2017 .

[21]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Quality of Information in Mobile Crowdsensing , 2017, ACM Trans. Sens. Networks.

[22]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[23]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks , 2004, SASN '04.

[24]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  Improving Data Quality with an Accumulated Reputation Model in Participatory Sensing Systems , 2014, Sensors.

[25]  Wen Hu,et al.  Are you contributing trustworthy data?: the case for a reputation system in participatory sensing , 2010, MSWIM '10.

[26]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  W2Q: A dual weighted QoI scoring mechanism in social sensing using community confidence , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[27]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms for Participatory Sensing , 2015, ACM Trans. Sens. Networks.

[28]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Enhancing Reliability of Vehicular Participatory Sensing Network: A Bayesian Approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[29]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  $QnQ$QnQ: Quality and Quantity Based Unified A , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[30]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  PS-Sim: A Framework for Scalable Simulation of Participatory Sensing Data , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[31]  Zhu Wang,et al.  Mobile Crowd Sensing and Computing , 2015, ACM Comput. Surv..

[32]  Dijiang Huang,et al.  PACP: An Efficient Pseudonymous Authentication-Based Conditional Privacy Protocol for VANETs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  A. Peters,et al.  Exposure to traffic and the onset of myocardial infarction. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Maxim Raya,et al.  Security Aspects of Inter-Vehicle Communications , 2005 .

[35]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Data-Driven Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[36]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  A Reputation Framework for Social Participatory Sensing Systems , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[37]  Soumya K. Ghosh,et al.  KITE: an efficient scheme for trust estimation and detection of errant nodes in vehicular cyber-physical systems , 2016, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[38]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  A Reputation System to Evaluate Participants for Participatory Sensing , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[39]  Fan Wu,et al.  Sustainable Incentives for Mobile Crowdsensing: Auctions, Lotteries, and Trust and Reputation Systems , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[40]  Kazuya Takeda,et al.  A Study of Driver Behavior Under Potential Threats in Vehicle Traffic , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[41]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  A Trust-Based Recruitment Framework for Multi-hop Social Participatory Sensing , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems.

[42]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  The security and privacy of smart vehicles , 2004, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[43]  Insup Lee,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution , 2010, Design Automation Conference.