Airplane Aeroelasticity: Practice and Potential

A perspective on the practice, issues, and potential of aeroelasticity is presented. The issues of cycle time reduction and improvements in the e delity of aeroelastic analysis need to be emphasized for aeroelasticity to support adequately the airplane cone guration development and cone guration decisions. The introduction of e y-by-wire control systems has increased the complexity as well as the e delity requirements for the aeroelastic analysis. The business cost of inaccuracies in loads and dynamics predictions can be seriously high. Therefore, innovative approaches should be encouraged to address these issues. Aeroelasticity has an opportunity to contribute to airplane design by evolving to become a more integrating discipline. Although many of the methods and processes in different subdisciplines are in place already, others need to be developed further for improved usability, efe ciency, e delity, and integration. The most challenging problems in realizing the full potential of aeroelasticity are not just technical but are also organizational in nature. The organizational issues are related to management of multidisciplinary teams in a lean engineering environment. Thus, to realize the multidisciplinary integrating potential of aeroelasticity and its contributions to thecone guration decisions, technical and managementforesight, leadership, and vision are required.

[1]  Ted L. Lomax.  Structural loads analysis for commercial transport aircraft : theory and practice , 1996 .

[2]  Mohamed Kaouk,et al.  Modal Analysis and Model Correlation of the Mir Space Station , 2000 .

[3]  R. L. Dreisbach.  ATLAS, an integrated structural analysis and design system. Volume 1: ATLAS user's guide , 1979 .

[4]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Evaluation of CFL3D for Unsteady Pressure and Flutter Predictions , 2003 .

[5]  K. L. Roger,et al.  Airplane Math Modeling Methods for Active Control Design , 1977 .

[6]  K. L. Roger,et al.  Evaluation of B-52 structural response to random turbulence with stability augmentation systems. , 1967 .

[7]  W. L. Gray,et al.  A Method for Calculating the Subsonic Steady-State Loading on an Airplane With a Wing of Arbitrary Plan Form and Stiffness , 1953 .

[8]  G. M. L. Gladwell,et al.  Branch mode analysis of vibrating systems , 1964 .

[9]  Kumar Bhatia,et al.  AEROELASTIC CHALLENGES FOR A HIGH SPEED CIVIL TRANSPORT , 1993 .

[10]  E. Meyer,et al.  Application of a new continuation method to flutter equations , 1988 .

[11]  Eli Livne,et al.  Future of Airplane Aeroelasticity , 2003 .

[12]  A Samareh Jamshid,et al.  A Unified Approach to Modeling Multidisciplinary Interactions , 2000 .

[13]  R. E. Clemmons,et al.  Dynamic loads analysis system (DYLOFLEX) summary. Volume 1: Engineering formulation , 1979 .

[14]  B. A. Winther,et al.  Reduced-Order Dynamic Aeroelastic Model Development and Integration with Nonlinear Simulation , 2000 .

[15]  W. Silva,et al.  Discrete-time linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses for efficient cfd analyses , 1997 .