DESIGN OF DECENTRALIZED ROBUST LFC IN A COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY ENVIRONMENT

A new decentralized robust controller for Load Frequency Control (LFC) in a deregulated electricity environment is presented in this paper. It is shown that subject to a condition based on the H1 norm and structured singular values (µ), each local area controller can be designed independently such that stability of the overall closed loop system is guaranteed. A generalized model for LFC scheme is developed based on the possible contracted scenarios. To achieve decentralization, the interfaces between control areas and the effects of load following contracts are treated as a set of new input disturbance signals in the control area dynamical model. In order to minimize the effects of the load disturbances under contract variations with large demand changes and to achieve desired level of robust performance in the presence of modeling uncertainties and practical constraints on control action the idea of mixed H2/H1 control technique is used for solution of the LFC problem. This newly developed design strategy combines the advantage of the H2 and H1 control synthesizes and gives a powerful multi-objectives design addressed by the Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) techniques. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on a three-area power system with possible contracted scenarios under large load demands. The results of the proposed controller are compared with the conventional PI controller and are shown to maintain robust performance in the presence of specified uncertainties and system nonlinearities. K e y w o r d s: LFC, decentralized control, deregulated power system, mixed H2/H1 control, robust control, LMI, large scale system

[1]  C. Scherer,et al.  Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Yasunori Mitani,et al.  Robust decentralized AGC in a restructured power system , 2004 .

[3]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Optimal load-frequency control in restructured power systems , 2003 .

[4]  L. H. Fink,et al.  Understanding automatic generation control , 1992 .

[5]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Interaction measures for systems under decentralized control , 1986, Autom..

[6]  Ali Feliachi On load frequency control in a deregulated environment , 1996, Proceeding of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications IEEE International Conference on Control Applications held together with IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Contro.

[7]  Ali Feliachi,et al.  Robust load frequency control using genetic algorithms and linear matrix inequalities , 2003 .

[8]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  AGC simulator for price-based operation. I. A model , 1997 .

[9]  A. Bose,et al.  Load frequency control issues in power system operations after deregulation , 1995, Proceedings of Power Industry Computer Applications Conference.

[10]  Boris Lohmann,et al.  Output feedback decentralized control of large-scale systems using weighted sensitivity functions minimization , 2002, Syst. Control. Lett..

[11]  M. A. Pai,et al.  Simulation and Optimization in an AGC System after Deregulation , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  A. Feliachi,et al.  Decentralized load frequency control for load following services , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[13]  M. Khammash,et al.  Sensitivity based structured singular value approach to stability robustness of power systems , 2000 .

[14]  Carsten W. Scherer,et al.  Multi-Objective Output-Feedback Control via LMI Optimization , 1996 .

[15]  J. Doyle,et al.  Essentials of Robust Control , 1997 .

[16]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  μ-analysis and synthesis toolbox: for use with Matlab , 1994 .