Doing Justice to the Group: Examining the Roles of the Group in Justice Research

Although the abstract notion of justice implies attention to fairness not simply for one individual but for many, emphasis on how individuals perceive and react to injustice obscures the role of the group in justice research. Justice, as distinct from individual deserving, holds promise for the well-being of the group. Indeed, the group plays multiple roles in justice research, as a collective standard, a structure in which evaluations occur, a source of identity, and a context of interaction. Analyses of these roles help to explain underlying orientations of group members, delimiting the scope of justice in groups and the implications of justice in conflict situations. This review concludes with directions for future research that more explicitly draw attention to the rightful role of the group in understanding justice in society.

[1]  Yuen J. Huo.  Procedural Justice and Social Regulation Across Group Boundaries: Does Subgroup Identity Undermine Relationship-Based Governance? , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Troy W. Hartley.  Environmental Justice: An Environmental Civil Rights Value Acceptable to All World Views , 1995 .

[3]  K. Cook,et al.  Justice and Power , 1986 .

[4]  Karen A. Hegtvedt.  Bargaining for justice: A means to resolve competing justice claims , 1992 .

[5]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Imbalanced structures, unfair strategies: power and justice in social exchange , 1994 .

[6]  F. Tougas,et al.  Reactions to Affirmative Action: Group Membership and Social Justice , 2001 .

[7]  David Schoem.  Intergroup Dialogue for a Just and Diverse Democracy , 2003 .

[8]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[9]  T. Schwinger,et al.  Laypersons' Conceptions of Social Relationships: A Test of Contract Theory , 1984 .

[10]  Rebecca Ford,et al.  Dependence Power, Legitimacy, and Tactical Choice , 1996 .

[11]  Kjell Y. Törnblom,et al.  Distributive Justice: Typology and Propositions , 1977 .

[12]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  A New Theory of Distributive Justice , 1980 .

[13]  G. Wagstaff.  Equity, equality, and need: Three principles of justice or one? An analysis of “equity as desert” , 1994 .

[14]  Morris Zelditch,et al.  Processes of Legitimation: Recent Developments and New Directions* , 2001 .

[15]  Susan V. Opotow.  Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction , 1990 .

[16]  N. Feather,et al.  Human Values and Their Relation to Justice , 1994 .

[17]  Christopher P. Parker,et al.  Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: a study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  M. Wenzel.  Social Identification As a Determinant of Concerns About Individual-, Group-, and Inclusive-Level Justice , 2004 .

[19]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Justice in social relations , 1986 .

[20]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Choices of Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Groups , 1987 .

[21]  Adam S. Weinberg,et al.  The Environmental Justice Movement: Equitable Allocation of the Costs and Benefits of Environmental Management Outcomes , 2001 .

[22]  T. Tyler,et al.  Intrinsic versus Community-Based Justice Models: When Does Group Membership Matter?. , 1990 .

[23]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  DO JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS INFLUENCE STYLES OF HANDLING CONFLICT WITH SUPERVISORS?: WHAT JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS, PRECISELY? , 2000 .

[24]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict , 1992 .

[25]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Deserving and the Emergence of Forms of Justice1 , 1976 .

[26]  Karen A. Hegtvedt,et al.  The Social Context of Responses to Injustice: Considering the Indirect and Direct Effects of Group-Level Factors , 2003 .

[27]  Gretchen Peterson,et al.  IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN SOCIAL EXCHANGE , 2003 .

[28]  Karen A. Hegtvedt,et al.  Justice Beyond the Individual: A Future with Legitimation* , 2000 .

[29]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Fairness and preference , 1979 .

[30]  T. Tyler,et al.  Moral Solidarity, Identification with the Community, and the Importance of Procedural Justice: The Police as Prototypical Representatives of a Group's Moral Values* , 2003 .

[31]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality , 1983 .

[32]  M. Wenzel,et al.  Justice and Social Conflict , 2000 .

[33]  K. Deaux,et al.  Individual Differences in Justice Behavior , 1982 .

[34]  H. Lamm.  Justice Considerations in Interpersonal Conflict , 1986 .

[35]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[36]  C. Albin.  The role of fairness in negotiation , 1993 .

[37]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[38]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Reciprocal Justice and Strategies of Exchange , 1993 .

[39]  Jody Clay-Warner.  Perceiving procedural injustice : The effects of group membership and status , 2001 .

[40]  Barry Markovsky.  TOWARD A MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE THEORY , 1985 .

[41]  D. Cremer,et al.  Respect and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Importance of Feeling Included , 2002 .

[42]  Paul M. Roman,et al.  Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice: How Experiences With Downsizing Condition Their Impact On Organizational Commitment , 2005 .

[43]  J. Feagin.  Social Justice and Sociology: Agendas for the Twenty-First Century , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[44]  M. Wenzel.  What Is Social about Justice? Inclusive Identity and Group Values as the Basis of the Justice Motive , 2002 .

[45]  S. Otten,et al.  To Our Benefit or at Your Expense? Justice Considerations in Intergroup Allocations of Positive and Negative Resources , 1999 .

[46]  David G. Wagner.  Gender Differences in Reward Preference , 1995 .

[47]  J. Perrolle.  Comments from the Special Issue Editor: The Emerging Dialogue on Environmental Justice , 1993 .

[48]  J. Vala,et al.  Relational Justice in Organizations: The Group-Value Model and Support for Change , 2002 .

[49]  H. Reis.  Levels of Interest in the Study of Interpersonal Justice , 1986 .

[50]  D. Watson,et al.  Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U.S. findings , 1984 .

[51]  A. Kahn,et al.  The Justice Process: Deciding Upon Equity or Equality , 1982 .

[52]  R. Lalonde,et al.  Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. , 1994 .

[53]  Shlomo Hareli.  Justice and deservingness judgments—refuting the interchangeability assumption , 1999 .

[54]  Ronald L. Cohen,et al.  On the Distinction Between Individual Deserving and Distributive Justice , 1979 .

[55]  D. Tjosvold.  Commitment to Justice in Conflict between Unequal Status Persons , 1977 .

[56]  John F. Stolte,et al.  The Legitimation of Structural Inequality: Reformulation and Test of the Self-Evaluation Argument , 1983 .

[57]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[58]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[59]  M. Clark.  Record keeping in two types of relationships. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  Fairness of individual rewards and fairness of the reward distribution: specifying the inconsistency between the micro and macro principles of justice , 1983 .

[61]  E. Lind,et al.  The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.