Universal photonic quantum computation via time-delayed feedback

Significance Creating large entangled states with photons as quantum information carriers is a central challenge for quantum information processing. Since photons do not interact directly, entangling them requires a nonlinear element. One approach is to sequentially generate photons using a quantum emitter that can induce quantum correlations between photons. Here we show that delayed quantum feedback dramatically expands the class of achievable photonic quantum states. In particular, we show that in state-of-the-art experiments with single atom-like quantum emitters, the most basic form of delayed quantum feedback already allows for creation of states that are universal resources for quantum computation. This opens avenues for quantum information processing with photons using minimal experimental resources. We propose and analyze a deterministic protocol to generate two-dimensional photonic cluster states using a single quantum emitter via time-delayed quantum feedback. As a physical implementation, we consider a single atom or atom-like system coupled to a 1D waveguide with a distant mirror, where guided photons represent the qubits, while the mirror allows the implementation of feedback. We identify the class of many-body quantum states that can be produced using this approach and characterize them in terms of 2D tensor network states.

[1]  E. Knill,et al.  A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[2]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Optically generated 2-dimensional photonic cluster state from coupled quantum dots , 2010, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[3]  Proposal for demonstration of long-range cluster state entanglement in the presence of photon loss , 2017 .

[4]  A. Grimsmo,et al.  Time-Delayed Quantum Feedback Control. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[5]  J. Cirac,et al.  Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network , 1996, quant-ph/9611017.

[6]  D. Englund,et al.  Solid-state single-photon emitters , 2016, Nature Photonics.

[7]  P. Shadbolt,et al.  Efficient detection of useful long-range entanglement in imperfect cluster states , 2017, 1702.01958.

[8]  R. Blatt,et al.  Quantum-state transfer from an ion to a photon , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[9]  Christian Junge,et al.  Nonlinear π phase shift for single fibre-guided photons interacting with a single resonator-enhanced atom , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[10]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Renormalization algorithms for Quantum-Many Body Systems in two and higher dimensions , 2004, cond-mat/0407066.

[11]  Terry Rudolph,et al.  Loss tolerance in one-way quantum computation via counterfactual error correction. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[12]  S. Berger,et al.  Microwave-Controlled Generation of Shaped Single Photons in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics , 2013, 1308.4094.

[13]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry , 2003, 0805.2853.

[14]  Y. Don,et al.  Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons , 2016, Science.

[15]  G. Milburn,et al.  Quantum Measurement and Control , 2009 .

[16]  Toshihiko Baba,et al.  Slow light in photonic crystals , 2008 .

[17]  J. D. Thompson,et al.  Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom , 2014, Nature.

[18]  Mihir K. Bhaskar,et al.  An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks , 2016, Science.

[19]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Experimental one-way quantum computing , 2005, Nature.

[20]  G. Milburn,et al.  Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits , 2005, quant-ph/0512071.

[21]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[22]  Peter Zoller,et al.  Photonic Circuits with Time Delays and Quantum Feedback. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[23]  L. Landau Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , 2003 .

[24]  Peter Zoller,et al.  Chiral quantum optics , 2016, Nature.

[25]  J. Marangos,et al.  Electromagnetically induced transparency : Optics in coherent media , 2005 .

[26]  Luigi Frunzio,et al.  Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits , 2017, Science.

[27]  Norbert Kalb,et al.  A quantum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom , 2014, Nature.

[28]  M. Aguado,et al.  Explicit tensor network representation for the ground states of string-net models , 2008, 0809.2393.

[29]  Terry Rudolph,et al.  Proposal for pulsed on-demand sources of photonic cluster state strings. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[30]  Martin V. Gustafsson,et al.  Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom , 2014, Science.

[31]  R Raussendorf,et al.  A one-way quantum computer. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[32]  P. Lodahl,et al.  Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures , 2013, 1312.1079.

[33]  Jin Dong Song,et al.  Deterministic photon-emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[34]  M. K. Bhaskar,et al.  An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks , 2016, Science.

[35]  L. Tornberg,et al.  Probing the quantum vacuum with an artificial atom in front of a mirror , 2014, Nature Physics.

[36]  H. Briegel,et al.  Measurement-based quantum computation , 2009, 0910.1116.

[37]  A. Wallraff,et al.  Exploring Interacting Quantum Many-Body Systems by Experimentally Creating Continuous Matrix Product States in Superconducting Circuits , 2015, 1508.06471.

[38]  H. Kimble,et al.  Atom–light interactions in photonic crystals , 2013, Nature Communications.

[39]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[40]  Sean Barrett,et al.  Simulating quantum fields with cavity QED. , 2012, Physical review letters.