Does diversity in novice teams lead to greater innovation?

Design teams are commonly formed in engineering courses with the assumption that diversity leads to more innovative solutions. However, the literature indicates that this assumption is conditional, based on factors such as team effectiveness and how diversity is defined. Additionally, prior research has focused on expert teams, rather than the novice teams typical of many engineering courses. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between team diversity, as a function of gender and race, team effectiveness, and innovation within novice engineering teams. First, we examined the relationship between diversity and team effectiveness. We used an established peer evaluation system to measure the team effectiveness ratings of 275 four-person teams. Gender heterogeneous teams were more effective than gender homogenous teams, but there was no significant difference between racially homogenous and heterogeneous teams. Second, we analyzed student team project reports for innovative design solutions. There was no correlation between team effectiveness and innovativeness, nor did gender heterogeneous teams produce more innovative solutions than gender homogenous teams. These results suggest diversity, defined by gender or race alone, may not increase innovation within novice engineering teams.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[2]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Software For Student Team Formation And Peer Evaluation: Catme Incorporates Team Maker , 2007 .

[3]  D. Fay,et al.  Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care , 2006 .

[4]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[5]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[6]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[7]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  The eyes have it : Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion , 1997 .

[8]  W. Heath The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[9]  M. West,et al.  Innovation and creativity at work::Psychological and organizational strategies , 1992 .

[10]  Susan P. Besemer Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the Model Structure and a Comparison Among Products--Three Novel Chairs , 1998 .

[11]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  C. Bao Iturbe,et al.  Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  P. K. Imbrie,et al.  Assessing Team Effectiveness: Comparing Peer Evaluations To A Team Effectiveness Instrument , 2009 .

[14]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Intelligence and creativity. , 2011 .

[15]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[16]  S. Cady,et al.  Team Innovation and Perceptions of Consideration , 1999 .

[17]  H. Christiaans Creativity as a Design Criterion , 2002 .

[18]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of engineering students , 2010 .

[19]  P. K. Imbrie,et al.  Assessing Team Effectiveness , 2005 .

[20]  R. Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[21]  Yves Punie,et al.  Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching , 2009 .