Cognitive accessibility in judgments of household energy consumption

Individuals appear to use the frequency that they interact with and think about various energy-consuming devices (the cognitive accessibility of those devices) when estimating relative energy consumption. This conclusion is based on 3 studies in which 608 participants estimated the percentages of total individual and household energy consumed annually in the U.S. by several categories of devices (e.g., lighting, cooking, water heating, air conditioning, computers, private motor vehicles) and 1 study in which 125 participants made similar estimates for their own consumption. Additionally, seasonal and geographical variations in local temperature predicted national annual consumption estimates for home heating and air conditioning, with these relationships being mediated by cognitive accessibility. Changes in available information, including more accessible cross-category and cross-fuel comparisons, greater media attention to high-consumption categories and high-impact solutions, and more disaggregated feedback regarding household energy use, could potentially improve consumers' understanding of relative consumption and hence their energy-conservation decisions.

[1]  John C. Baird,et al.  Perceptual Awareness of Energy Requirements of Familiar Objects , 1981 .

[2]  Shahzeen Z Attari,et al.  Perceptions of water use , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[4]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[7]  Ahmad Faruqui,et al.  The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption d A survey of the experimental evidence , 2010 .

[8]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Do home energy management systems make sense? Assessing their overall lifecycle impact , 2013 .

[9]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death , 1979 .

[11]  Jeannet H. Van Houwelingen,et al.  The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use , 1989 .

[12]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Implementing the Behavioral Wedge: Designing and Adopting Effective Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs , 2010 .

[13]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[14]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. , 1986 .

[15]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The MPG Illusion , 2008, Science.

[16]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[17]  Clayton R. Critcher,et al.  Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Osamu Saeki,et al.  Effectiveness of an energy-consumption information system for residential buildings , 2006 .

[19]  Michael Nye,et al.  Re-materialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems , 2008 .

[20]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  How do people judge risks: availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both? , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[23]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[24]  Elizabeth A. Keenan,et al.  How warm days increase belief in global warming , 2014 .

[25]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Cultivating energy literacy: results from a longitudinal living lab study of a home energy management system , 2013, CHI.

[26]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change , 2008 .

[27]  Daniel Mochon,et al.  Characterizing perceptions of energy consumption , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Pooya Soltantabar Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .

[29]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[30]  H. Arkes Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[31]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Partition Priming in Judgment Under Uncertainty , 2003, Psychological science.

[32]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[33]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[34]  Shahzeen Z. Attari,et al.  Reply to Frederick et al.: Anchoring effects on energy perceptions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[36]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .

[37]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach , 2012, Journal of behavioral decision making.

[38]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Local Warming , 2011, Psychological science.

[39]  Nicholas J. G. Winter,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Content Analysis of Political Communication , 2016 .

[40]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Time to try carbon labelling , 2011 .

[41]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[42]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[43]  E. Peters Beyond Comprehension , 2012 .

[44]  V. Reyna,et al.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  R. Thaler,et al.  Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans , 2001 .

[46]  Osamu Saeki,et al.  Effectiveness of an energy-consumption information system on energy savings in residential houses based on monitored data , 2006 .

[47]  P. Stern Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[48]  J. Joireman,et al.  Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming , 2010 .

[49]  宮森 悠 ライブラリー Annual Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[50]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Folk quantification of energy , 1982 .

[51]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Behavioral Science and Energy Policy , 2010 .

[52]  I. Mansouri,et al.  Energy consumption in UK households: Impact of domestic electrical appliances , 1996 .

[53]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[54]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Use of Narrative Evidence and Explicit Likelihood by Decisionmakers Varying in Numeracy , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[55]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[56]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[57]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[58]  S. Stigler,et al.  Regression Toward the Mean and the Study of Change , 1980 .

[59]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[61]  J. Santeau When does a response error become a judgmental bias? Commentary on "Judged Frequency of Lethal Events". , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[62]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.